Electoral Cycles in Fiscal Rules: International Empirical Evidence

Abstract Using panel data from 99 countries over the period of 1985–2020, this study aims to uncover that fiscal rules work in electoral cycles. The results show that fiscal rules are less likely to be implemented in the pre-election year. We also find that this loosening in fiscal rules is especially prominent in cases when the incumbent political party can wield significant political power, where countries are less developed economically and politically, and where the management of fiscal rules is more likely to be exposed to discretionary interventions. Our findings are aligned with the opportunistic political budget cycles, in which politicians exploit fiscal policies and systems to serve their own political incentives. These results suggest that even fiscal rules, which are designed to prevent political pressure, are also subject to political process. (JEL codes: D72, D78, E32, E62, H11, and H60).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CESifo Economic Studies
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifae019
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electoral Cycles in Fiscal Rules: International Empirical Evidence

Hoyong Jung, Bong Hwan Kim
2 citations
CESifo Economic Studies
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
2.26
article

Electoral Cycles in Fiscal Rules: International Empirical Evidence

Hoyong Jung, Bong Hwan Kim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using panel data from 99 countries over the period of 1985–2020, this study aims to uncover that fiscal rules work in electoral cycles. The results show that fiscal rules are less likely to be implemented in the pre-election year. We also find that this loosening in fiscal rules is especially prominent in cases when the incumbent political party can wield significant political power, where countries are less developed economically and politically, and where the management of fiscal rules is more likely to be exposed to discretionary interventions. Our findings are aligned with the opportunistic political budget cycles, in which politicians exploit fiscal policies and systems to serve their own political incentives. These results suggest that even fiscal rules, which are designed to prevent political pressure, are also subject to political process. (JEL codes: D72, D78, E32, E62, H11, and H60).

CESifo Economic StudiesVol. 70(4)
Seoul National University (KR), The Korea Institute of Public Administration (KR)
Seoul National University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Electoral Cycles in Fiscal Rules: International Empirical Evidence — Hoyong Jung, Bong Hwan Kim · CESifo Economic Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS