Masking Effects Caused by Contralateral Distractors in Participants With Versus Without Listening Difficulties

Significantly larger masking effects due to a contralateral distractor sound observed in patients with listening difficulties without apparent peripheral pathology may suggest the possible involvement of masking mechanisms other than the energetic masking mechanism occurring in the periphery in these patients. In addition, it was also shown that the masking effect is more pronounced with real environmental sounds, that is, music with lyrics, than with continuous steady noise, which is often used as a masker for speech-in-noise testing in clinical trials. In other words, it should be noted that a speech-in-noise test using such steady noise may underestimate the degree of listening problems of patients with listening difficulties in their daily lives, and a speech-in-noise test using a masker such as music and/or speech sounds could make listening problems more obvious in patients with listening difficulties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001591
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Masking Effects Caused by Contralateral Distractors in Participants With Versus Without Listening Difficulties

Jun Suzuki, Chie Obuchi, Yukio Katori, Tetsuaki Kawase et al.
1 citations
Ear and Hearing
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
0.34
article

Masking Effects Caused by Contralateral Distractors in Participants With Versus Without Listening Difficulties

Jun Suzuki, Chie Obuchi, Yukio Katori, Tetsuaki Kawase, Shuichi Sakamoto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Significantly larger masking effects due to a contralateral distractor sound observed in patients with listening difficulties without apparent peripheral pathology may suggest the possible involvement of masking mechanisms other than the energetic masking mechanism occurring in the periphery in these patients. In addition, it was also shown that the masking effect is more pronounced with real environmental sounds, that is, music with lyrics, than with continuous steady noise, which is often used as a masker for speech-in-noise testing in clinical trials. In other words, it should be noted that a speech-in-noise test using such steady noise may underestimate the degree of listening problems of patients with listening difficulties in their daily lives, and a speech-in-noise test using a masker such as music and/or speech sounds could make listening problems more obvious in patients with listening difficulties.

Ear and HearingVol. 46(2)
University of Tsukuba (JP), Tohoku University (JP)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Masking Effects Caused by Contralateral Distractors in Participants With Versus Without Listening Difficulties — Jun Suzuki, Chie Obuchi, et al. · Ear and Hearing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS