Space-time modeling of cascading hazards: Chaining wildfires, rainfall and landslide events through machine learning

• A space–time landslide susceptibility modeling routine is implemented. • A yearly variation of the susceptibility is allowed for the Camaldoli hill. • The wildfire spatio-temporal signature is included in the predictor set. • The wildfire inclusion improves the performance by at least 10% • A full suite of cross-validation runs is tested in space, time and space–time. The current study sets out to explore yearly landslide susceptibility dynamics on slopes regularly affected by fires. To do so, two yearly inventories have been generated, one for the landslides and one for the wildfires, for an area of approximately 2 km 2 and for a period of 24 years. It is important to stress that space–time data-driven models employed for susceptibility assessment are relatively new, and their application so far has mostly linked landslide occurrences to the precipitation trigger and the standard morphometric characteristics of the landscape at hand. Here we also consider an additional element of disturbance to the slope equilibrium, in the form of burnt areas tested from one up to three years priors to the reference landslide occurrence time. The relevance of the wildfire spatiotemporal signal is tested as part of a multi-variate modeling procedure. The results highlight at least a 10 % performance increase when these wildfire-related predictors are featured (from an average AUC of 0.75 to 0.85 in a random forest modeling framework). The associated yearly variations in the landslide occurrence probability are translated into individual maps, stressing the extent to which the standard and static definition of susceptibility does not hold especially in the context of multiple hazards and in an urban setting such as the Camaldoli hills (Naples, Italy) we chose for our test site.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108452
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Space-time modeling of cascading hazards: Chaining wildfires, rainfall and landslide events through machine learning

Mariano Di Napoli, Hakan Tanyaş, Luigi Lombardo, Diego Di Martire et al.
6 citations
CATENA
Landslides and related hazards
4.26
article

Space-time modeling of cascading hazards: Chaining wildfires, rainfall and landslide events through machine learning

Mariano Di Napoli, Hakan Tanyaş, Luigi Lombardo, Diego Di Martire, Bastian van den Bout, Cannur Eroglu
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• A space–time landslide susceptibility modeling routine is implemented. • A yearly variation of the susceptibility is allowed for the Camaldoli hill. • The wildfire spatio-temporal signature is included in the predictor set. • The wildfire inclusion improves the performance by at least 10% • A full suite of cross-validation runs is tested in space, time and space–time. The current study sets out to explore yearly landslide susceptibility dynamics on slopes regularly affected by fires. To do so, two yearly inventories have been generated, one for the landslides and one for the wildfires, for an area of approximately 2 km 2 and for a period of 24 years. It is important to stress that space–time data-driven models employed for susceptibility assessment are relatively new, and their application so far has mostly linked landslide occurrences to the precipitation trigger and the standard morphometric characteristics of the landscape at hand. Here we also consider an additional element of disturbance to the slope equilibrium, in the form of burnt areas tested from one up to three years priors to the reference landslide occurrence time. The relevance of the wildfire spatiotemporal signal is tested as part of a multi-variate modeling procedure. The results highlight at least a 10 % performance increase when these wildfire-related predictors are featured (from an average AUC of 0.75 to 0.85 in a random forest modeling framework). The associated yearly variations in the landslide occurrence probability are translated into individual maps, stressing the extent to which the standard and static definition of susceptibility does not hold especially in the context of multiple hazards and in an urban setting such as the Camaldoli hills (Naples, Italy) we chose for our test site.

CATENAVol. 246
Policlinico Casilino (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT), University of Twente (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Landslides and related hazards
4.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.