Power dynamics in transaction platforms: Adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs

This study investigates the adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs (PDEs) to mitigate venture survival risks associated with power asymmetries on transaction platforms. Using an embedded single case study design, we explore the decade-long survival of a PDE's firm in EdTech, focusing on its relationship with two dominant platforms, Google Search and AdSense. Our findings culminate in a robust framework that elucidates the strategic responses of PDEs to the challenges of power imbalance and its exercise through platform governance. Critically, the study reveals that PDEs assert their self-determination in a two-step process that is best observed over time. Strategic subjectification, followed by multihoming and diversification, can be observed over a long temporal duration, emerging as crucial mechanisms for managing dependency risks. This study contributes to the platform strategy literature by shifting the focus from owners to participants, simultaneously illuminating entrepreneurial resilience amid power-related uncertainties. • Platform-dependent entrepreneurs (PDEs) must perpetually navigate power asymmetries on transaction platforms. • Evolving governance mechanisms in access and control increase venture survival risks and create uncertainty. • PDEs are proactive, not passive, in responding to platform power dynamics, contrary to previous assumptions. • Strategies such as subjectification, multihoming, and diversification help build resilience. • Subjectification is key to resource acquisition and strategic redeployment, initiating a two-step adaptive process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technovation
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103114
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power dynamics in transaction platforms: Adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs

Kisito F. Nzembayie, David Urbano, Natasha Evers
9 citations
Technovation
Digital Platforms and Economics
4.99
article

Power dynamics in transaction platforms: Adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs

Kisito F. Nzembayie, David Urbano, Natasha Evers
article en
9 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs (PDEs) to mitigate venture survival risks associated with power asymmetries on transaction platforms. Using an embedded single case study design, we explore the decade-long survival of a PDE's firm in EdTech, focusing on its relationship with two dominant platforms, Google Search and AdSense. Our findings culminate in a robust framework that elucidates the strategic responses of PDEs to the challenges of power imbalance and its exercise through platform governance. Critically, the study reveals that PDEs assert their self-determination in a two-step process that is best observed over time. Strategic subjectification, followed by multihoming and diversification, can be observed over a long temporal duration, emerging as crucial mechanisms for managing dependency risks. This study contributes to the platform strategy literature by shifting the focus from owners to participants, simultaneously illuminating entrepreneurial resilience amid power-related uncertainties. • Platform-dependent entrepreneurs (PDEs) must perpetually navigate power asymmetries on transaction platforms. • Evolving governance mechanisms in access and control increase venture survival risks and create uncertainty. • PDEs are proactive, not passive, in responding to platform power dynamics, contrary to previous assumptions. • Strategies such as subjectification, multihoming, and diversification help build resilience. • Subjectification is key to resource acquisition and strategic redeployment, initiating a two-step adaptive process.

TechnovationVol. 138
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Platforms and Economics
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.