Vaccination hesitancy: agreement between WHO and ChatGPT-4.0 or Gemini Advanced.

The rate of agreement between WHO answers and Chat-GPT-4.0 or Gemini Advanced was very high, as both provided 36 (94.7%) appropriate responses. The few discrepancies between WHO and AI-chatbots answers could not be considered "harmful", and both chatbots often invited the user to check reliable sources, such as CDC or the WHO websites, or to contact a local healthcare professional. In their current versions, both AI-chatbots may already be powerful instrument to support the traditional communication tools in primary prevention, with the potential to improve health literacy, medication adherence, and vaccine hesitancy and concerns. Given the rapid evolution of AI-based systems, further studies are strongly needed to monitor their accuracy and reliability over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7416/ai.2024.2657
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vaccination hesitancy: agreement between WHO and ChatGPT-4.0 or Gemini Advanced.

Enrico Zauli, Matteo Fiore, Alessandro Bianconi, Lamberto Manzoli et al.
1 citations
PubMed
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Vaccination hesitancy: agreement between WHO and ChatGPT-4.0 or Gemini Advanced.

Enrico Zauli, Matteo Fiore, Alessandro Bianconi, Lamberto Manzoli, Maria Elena Flacco, Annalisa Rosso, Cecilia Acuti Martellucci
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rate of agreement between WHO answers and Chat-GPT-4.0 or Gemini Advanced was very high, as both provided 36 (94.7%) appropriate responses. The few discrepancies between WHO and AI-chatbots answers could not be considered "harmful", and both chatbots often invited the user to check reliable sources, such as CDC or the WHO websites, or to contact a local healthcare professional. In their current versions, both AI-chatbots may already be powerful instrument to support the traditional communication tools in primary prevention, with the potential to improve health literacy, medication adherence, and vaccine hesitancy and concerns. Given the rapid evolution of AI-based systems, further studies are strongly needed to monitor their accuracy and reliability over time.

PubMedVol. 37(3)
University of Ferrara (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Vaccination hesitancy: agreement between WHO and ChatGPT-4.0 or Gemini Advanced. — Enrico Zauli, Matteo Fiore, et al. · PubMed (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS