Association between telehealth use in oncology and downstream utilization at a large academic health system

BackgroundWhile telemedicine has been beneficial in oncology by reducing infectious exposure and improving access for patients with poor functional status, it also has intrinsic limitations, including the inability to perform a physical exam, which could lead to increased downstream utilization in this population at high risk of medical decompensation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating the relationship between telemedicine use in oncology and subsequent outpatient oncology encounters, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.MethodsWe included outpatient oncology encounters, including telemedicine and in-person visits, occurring between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 at a large academic health system. Unadjusted descriptive statistics and multiple linear regressions were used to estimate subsequent outpatient oncology visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 30 days of an index visit based on modality (telemedicine versus in-person). The multiple regressions were adjusted for various demographic and clinical characteristics, including palliative care visits, baseline utilization, recent chemotherapy, and comorbidities.ResultsOur cohort included 63,722 patients with 689,356 outpatient encounters, of which 639,217 (92.7%) were in-person and 50,139 (7.3%) were telemedicine visits. Patients on average had 0.91 outpatient oncology visits, 0.04 ED visits, and 0.05 hospitalizations within 30 days following an index encounter. In our adjusted analyses, telemedicine was associated with 13.7 fewer downstream outpatient oncology visits (95% CI 12.5-14.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters, 0.7 fewer ED visits (95% CI 0.4-1.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters and 0.9 fewer hospitalizations (95% CI 0.6-1.3; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters compared to in-person visits.ConclusionsContrary to our hypothesis, oncology patients who had a telemedicine visit had fewer follow-up outpatient oncology encounters, ED visits and hospitalizations after 30 days than those with in-person visits. Future studies should further investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in oncology and outline specific scenarios for appropriate use in this and other populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x241282820
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between telehealth use in oncology and downstream utilization at a large academic health system

Preeti Kakani, Chad Villaflores, John N. Mafi, Catherine A. Sarkisian et al.
3 citations
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.63
article

Association between telehealth use in oncology and downstream utilization at a large academic health system

Preeti Kakani, Chad Villaflores, John N. Mafi, Catherine A. Sarkisian, Cheryl L. Damberg, Sitaram Vangala, Manying Cui, Maria Han, Miguel A. Cuevas, Adam Singer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

BackgroundWhile telemedicine has been beneficial in oncology by reducing infectious exposure and improving access for patients with poor functional status, it also has intrinsic limitations, including the inability to perform a physical exam, which could lead to increased downstream utilization in this population at high risk of medical decompensation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating the relationship between telemedicine use in oncology and subsequent outpatient oncology encounters, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations.MethodsWe included outpatient oncology encounters, including telemedicine and in-person visits, occurring between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 at a large academic health system. Unadjusted descriptive statistics and multiple linear regressions were used to estimate subsequent outpatient oncology visits, ED visits, and hospitalizations within 30 days of an index visit based on modality (telemedicine versus in-person). The multiple regressions were adjusted for various demographic and clinical characteristics, including palliative care visits, baseline utilization, recent chemotherapy, and comorbidities.ResultsOur cohort included 63,722 patients with 689,356 outpatient encounters, of which 639,217 (92.7%) were in-person and 50,139 (7.3%) were telemedicine visits. Patients on average had 0.91 outpatient oncology visits, 0.04 ED visits, and 0.05 hospitalizations within 30 days following an index encounter. In our adjusted analyses, telemedicine was associated with 13.7 fewer downstream outpatient oncology visits (95% CI 12.5-14.9; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters, 0.7 fewer ED visits (95% CI 0.4-1.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters and 0.9 fewer hospitalizations (95% CI 0.6-1.3; <i>p</i> < 0.001) per 100 index encounters compared to in-person visits.ConclusionsContrary to our hypothesis, oncology patients who had a telemedicine visit had fewer follow-up outpatient oncology encounters, ED visits and hospitalizations after 30 days than those with in-person visits. Future studies should further investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in oncology and outline specific scenarios for appropriate use in this and other populations.

Journal of Telemedicine and TelecareVol. 31(9)
RAND Corporation (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (US), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.