Topic Modeling for Faster Literature Screening Using Transformer-Based Embeddings

Systematic reviews are a powerful tool to summarize the existing evidence in medical literature. However, identifying relevant articles is difficult, and this typically involves structured searches with keyword-based strategies, followed by the painstaking manual selection of relevant evidence. A.I. may help investigators, for example, through topic modeling, i.e., algorithms that can understand the content of a text. We applied BERTopic, a transformer-based topic-modeling algorithm, to two datasets consisting of 6137 and 5309 articles, respectively, used in recently published systematic reviews on peri-implantitis and bone regeneration. We extracted the title of each article, encoded it into embeddings, and input it into BERTopic, which then rapidly identified 14 and 22 topic clusters, respectively, and it automatically created labels describing the content of these groups based on their semantics. For both datasets, BERTopic uncovered a variable number of articles unrelated to the query, which accounted for up to 30% of the dataset—achieving a sensitivity of up to 0.79 and a specificity of at least 0.99. These articles could have been discarded from the screening, reducing the workload of investigators. Our results suggest that adding a topic-modeling step to the screening process could potentially save working hours for researchers involved in systematic reviews of the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metrics
Published
2024-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/metrics1010002
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Topic Modeling for Faster Literature Screening Using Transformer-Based Embeddings

Elena Calciolari, Claudio Cusano, Carlo Galli, Nikolaos Donos et al.
8 citations
Metrics
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
15.15
article

Topic Modeling for Faster Literature Screening Using Transformer-Based Embeddings

Elena Calciolari, Claudio Cusano, Carlo Galli, Nikolaos Donos, Marco Meleti
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Systematic reviews are a powerful tool to summarize the existing evidence in medical literature. However, identifying relevant articles is difficult, and this typically involves structured searches with keyword-based strategies, followed by the painstaking manual selection of relevant evidence. A.I. may help investigators, for example, through topic modeling, i.e., algorithms that can understand the content of a text. We applied BERTopic, a transformer-based topic-modeling algorithm, to two datasets consisting of 6137 and 5309 articles, respectively, used in recently published systematic reviews on peri-implantitis and bone regeneration. We extracted the title of each article, encoded it into embeddings, and input it into BERTopic, which then rapidly identified 14 and 22 topic clusters, respectively, and it automatically created labels describing the content of these groups based on their semantics. For both datasets, BERTopic uncovered a variable number of articles unrelated to the query, which accounted for up to 30% of the dataset—achieving a sensitivity of up to 0.79 and a specificity of at least 0.99. These articles could have been discarded from the screening, reducing the workload of investigators. Our results suggest that adding a topic-modeling step to the screening process could potentially save working hours for researchers involved in systematic reviews of the literature.

MetricsVol. 1(1)
University of Parma (IT), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Pavia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
15.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.