Fault asperity and roughness, insight from faults in 3D reflection seismic data

The complexity of faults and the bias in the gathered fault data from different sources such as outcrops, reflection seismic data and earthquakes causes uncertainty to the understanding of fault plane geometry at the seismic scale, among other fault geometric attributes. Fault plane roughness and irregularities at different scales are important geometric attributes caused by asperities, which are linked to the fault frictional behaviour and mechanics. Asperities are localized areas with higher strength on the fault plane, which resist the applied stress to a certain limit before the fault ruptures. Imaging faults’ real geometry can help us to gain more insight into the fault roughness and asperities, thereby enhancing our understanding of the mechanics of faulting and earthquakes. In this study, for the first time, we map fault asperities and roughness on seismic scale faults using their 3D structures extracted from reflection seismic data. We have studied 21 normal faults ranging in depth from about 0.5 to 3 km with clastic dominated lithology and some carbonates by extracting and characterizing their true fault plane geometry on 3D reflection seismic data using Gaussian filtered coherency attributes and measuring throw over the entire fault plane. The outline of the mapped asperities is the envelope of internal tip-points between the segments on the fault plane 3D structure. Our results show that in most cases, at the boundary of the asperities, the strike of fault internal segments changes and the throw increases. We have introduced two new attributes characterizing fault plane roughness at seismic scale, notably 2D roughness attribute and segment mean roughness. The variations of these two attributes, i.e. higher values near the asperity boundary, have close link to the locations of asperities on the fault planes. • Faults 3D shapes were characterized on seismic data using Gaussian filtered coherency attributes and throw measurements. • Fault asperities on internal tip-points between the fault segments were mapped on the 3D fault structures. • At the location of asperities, the strike of fault segments change, and the throw increases. • Two new attributes were introduced to assess fault plane roughness at seismic scale: 2D roughness and segment mean roughness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine and Petroleum Geology
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2024.107145
Citations
5
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fault asperity and roughness, insight from faults in 3D reflection seismic data

Behzad Alaei, Anita Torabi
5 citations
Marine and Petroleum Geology
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.67
article

Fault asperity and roughness, insight from faults in 3D reflection seismic data

Behzad Alaei, Anita Torabi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The complexity of faults and the bias in the gathered fault data from different sources such as outcrops, reflection seismic data and earthquakes causes uncertainty to the understanding of fault plane geometry at the seismic scale, among other fault geometric attributes. Fault plane roughness and irregularities at different scales are important geometric attributes caused by asperities, which are linked to the fault frictional behaviour and mechanics. Asperities are localized areas with higher strength on the fault plane, which resist the applied stress to a certain limit before the fault ruptures. Imaging faults’ real geometry can help us to gain more insight into the fault roughness and asperities, thereby enhancing our understanding of the mechanics of faulting and earthquakes. In this study, for the first time, we map fault asperities and roughness on seismic scale faults using their 3D structures extracted from reflection seismic data. We have studied 21 normal faults ranging in depth from about 0.5 to 3 km with clastic dominated lithology and some carbonates by extracting and characterizing their true fault plane geometry on 3D reflection seismic data using Gaussian filtered coherency attributes and measuring throw over the entire fault plane. The outline of the mapped asperities is the envelope of internal tip-points between the segments on the fault plane 3D structure. Our results show that in most cases, at the boundary of the asperities, the strike of fault internal segments changes and the throw increases. We have introduced two new attributes characterizing fault plane roughness at seismic scale, notably 2D roughness attribute and segment mean roughness. The variations of these two attributes, i.e. higher values near the asperity boundary, have close link to the locations of asperities on the fault planes. • Faults 3D shapes were characterized on seismic data using Gaussian filtered coherency attributes and throw measurements. • Fault asperities on internal tip-points between the fault segments were mapped on the 3D fault structures. • At the location of asperities, the strike of fault segments change, and the throw increases. • Two new attributes were introduced to assess fault plane roughness at seismic scale: 2D roughness and segment mean roughness.

Marine and Petroleum GeologyVol. 170
University of Oslo (NO), Systems Analytics (United States) (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.