Multi‐objective based container placement strategy in CaaS

Abstract In contrast to a conventional virtual machine (VM), a container is a lightweight virtualization technology. Containers are becoming a prominent technology for cloud services because of their portable, scalable, and flexible deployments, especially in the Internet of Things (IoT), smart devices, and fog and edge computing. It is a type of operating system‐level virtualization in which the kernel allows multiple isolated containers to run independently. Container placement (CP) is a nontrivial problem in Container‐as‐a‐Service (CaaS). CP is mapping to a container over virtual machines (VMs) to execute an application. Designing an efficient CP strategy is complex due to several intertwined challenges. These challenges arise from a diverse spectrum of computing resources, like on‐demand and unpredictable fluctuations of IT resources by multiple tenants. In this article, we propose a modified sum‐based container placement algorithm called a multi‐objective optimization‐based container placement algorithm (MSBCPA). In the proposed algorithm, we have considered two metrics: makespan and monetary costs for optimizing available IT resources. We have conducted comprehensive simulation experiments to validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm over the CloudSim 4.0 simulator. The proposed optimization algorithm (MSBCPA) aims to minimize the makespan and the execution monetary costs simultaneously. In the simulation, we found that the execution cost and energy consumption cost reduce by 20% to 30% and achieve the best possible cost‐makespan trade‐offs compared to competing algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Software Practice and Experience
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3376
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐objective based container placement strategy in CaaS

Sambit Kumar Mishra, Md. Akram Khan, Bibhudatta Sahoo, Achyut Shankar
6 citations
Software Practice and Experience
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
2.09
article

Multi‐objective based container placement strategy in CaaS

Sambit Kumar Mishra, Md. Akram Khan, Bibhudatta Sahoo, Achyut Shankar
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract In contrast to a conventional virtual machine (VM), a container is a lightweight virtualization technology. Containers are becoming a prominent technology for cloud services because of their portable, scalable, and flexible deployments, especially in the Internet of Things (IoT), smart devices, and fog and edge computing. It is a type of operating system‐level virtualization in which the kernel allows multiple isolated containers to run independently. Container placement (CP) is a nontrivial problem in Container‐as‐a‐Service (CaaS). CP is mapping to a container over virtual machines (VMs) to execute an application. Designing an efficient CP strategy is complex due to several intertwined challenges. These challenges arise from a diverse spectrum of computing resources, like on‐demand and unpredictable fluctuations of IT resources by multiple tenants. In this article, we propose a modified sum‐based container placement algorithm called a multi‐objective optimization‐based container placement algorithm (MSBCPA). In the proposed algorithm, we have considered two metrics: makespan and monetary costs for optimizing available IT resources. We have conducted comprehensive simulation experiments to validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm over the CloudSim 4.0 simulator. The proposed optimization algorithm (MSBCPA) aims to minimize the makespan and the execution monetary costs simultaneously. In the simulation, we found that the execution cost and energy consumption cost reduce by 20% to 30% and achieve the best possible cost‐makespan trade‐offs compared to competing algorithms.

Software Practice and ExperienceVol. 55(3)
Chandigarh University (IN), Lovely Professional University (IN), National Institute of Technology Rourkela (IN), University of Warwick (GB), SRM University, Andhra Pradesh (IN), Graphic Era University (IN), Chitkara University (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.