ESG assurance in the United States

We provide the first large-sample evidence on third-party verification of firms’ environmental and social metrics in ESG reports (ESG assurance) in the United States. Focusing on the S&P 500 from 2010–2020, we document a striking increase in not only the number of firms with ESG assurance—in 2020 (2010), 76% (38%) of the S&P 500 had an ESG report and 46% (16%) involved assurance—but also the number of metrics assured. Unlike financial audits, ESG assurance varies widely in form and substance, including the choice of metrics assured, the level of assurance, and assuror identity. We show that firms’ decision to obtain ESG assurance is primarily driven by their adoption of ESG reporting frameworks and peer effects, with firm characteristics documented in prior literature playing only a minor role. Assurance is associated with improvements in ESG disclosure, ESG ratings, and the number of institutional investors holding the firm’s stock.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-024-09856-2
Citations
47
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG assurance in the United States

Shawn Shi, Brandon Gipper, Samantha M. Ross
47 citations
Review of Accounting Studies
Regulation and Compliance Studies
24.96
article

ESG assurance in the United States

Shawn Shi, Brandon Gipper, Samantha M. Ross
article en
47 citations

Abstract

We provide the first large-sample evidence on third-party verification of firms’ environmental and social metrics in ESG reports (ESG assurance) in the United States. Focusing on the S&P 500 from 2010–2020, we document a striking increase in not only the number of firms with ESG assurance—in 2020 (2010), 76% (38%) of the S&P 500 had an ESG report and 46% (16%) involved assurance—but also the number of metrics assured. Unlike financial audits, ESG assurance varies widely in form and substance, including the choice of metrics assured, the level of assurance, and assuror identity. We show that firms’ decision to obtain ESG assurance is primarily driven by their adoption of ESG reporting frameworks and peer effects, with firm characteristics documented in prior literature playing only a minor role. Assurance is associated with improvements in ESG disclosure, ESG ratings, and the number of institutional investors holding the firm’s stock.

Review of Accounting StudiesVol. 30(2)
University of Washington (US), Seattle University (US), Stanford University (US)
Yale University, Northwestern University, Washington University in St. Louis, University of Washington, Yale School of Management, Stanford Graduate School of Business
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
24.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ESG assurance in the United States — Shawn Shi, Brandon Gipper, et al. · Review of Accounting Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS