Similar, not universal: the cognitive dimensions of conceptual prototypes of basic emotions in English and in Polish

The current study explores the differences in conceptualisation of the prototypical basic emotion lexicalisations (<i>anger</i>, <i>disgust</i>, <i>fear</i>, <i>joy</i>, <i>sadness</i>, <i>surprise</i>) in English and in Polish. Measures of concreteness, imageability and context availability were collected and analysed across the six semantic categories of basic emotions, across different parts of speech and between the self-determined genders of the study participants. The initial results indicate that within these cognitive dimensions the conceptualisations of basic emotions in English and in Polish are only similar on the more general but not the higher levels of conceptualisation. The folk-psychological division between positive and negative emotions and the grammatical parts of speech reveal similar patterns in basic emotion concepts in both Polish and in English. However, on the higher levels of conceptualisations that include specific basic emotion semantic categories and self-identified gender, marked language-specific differences become apparent. Different negative emotions drive the statistical differences in Polish and in English, and the gender effects on the measures of concreteness, imageability and context availability are opposite from one language to the other. In other words, basic emotions may be broadly mutually intelligible, but not exactly the same when communicated across languages and cultures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2024.2406347
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similar, not universal: the cognitive dimensions of conceptual prototypes of basic emotions in English and in Polish

Jeanette Altarriba, Halszka Bąk
1 citations
Cognition & Emotion
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
0.51
article

Similar, not universal: the cognitive dimensions of conceptual prototypes of basic emotions in English and in Polish

Jeanette Altarriba, Halszka Bąk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The current study explores the differences in conceptualisation of the prototypical basic emotion lexicalisations (<i>anger</i>, <i>disgust</i>, <i>fear</i>, <i>joy</i>, <i>sadness</i>, <i>surprise</i>) in English and in Polish. Measures of concreteness, imageability and context availability were collected and analysed across the six semantic categories of basic emotions, across different parts of speech and between the self-determined genders of the study participants. The initial results indicate that within these cognitive dimensions the conceptualisations of basic emotions in English and in Polish are only similar on the more general but not the higher levels of conceptualisation. The folk-psychological division between positive and negative emotions and the grammatical parts of speech reveal similar patterns in basic emotion concepts in both Polish and in English. However, on the higher levels of conceptualisations that include specific basic emotion semantic categories and self-identified gender, marked language-specific differences become apparent. Different negative emotions drive the statistical differences in Polish and in English, and the gender effects on the measures of concreteness, imageability and context availability are opposite from one language to the other. In other words, basic emotions may be broadly mutually intelligible, but not exactly the same when communicated across languages and cultures.

Cognition & EmotionVol. 39(2)
Albany State University (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.