Reconstruction of the Regulation of Authority for Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) in Nautical Affairs for Handling Ship Accidents Based on Justice Values

Indonesia, possessing the second-longest coastline globally, relies extensively on sea transportation, highlighting the necessity for proficient management of nautical incidents. The authority of Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) in nautical affairs is delineated in Article 282 of Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping. However, the current framework, which places PPNS under the supervision of police investigators, can lead to biased investigations due to the pressure to conform to police findings, thereby compromising the independence and objectivity of PPNS. This study aims to analyse and prove that the regulation of PPNS authority in handling ship accidents is not founded on justice values, identifying several critical weaknesses, and proposing reforms to address them. Using a socio-legal research approach and incorporating primary and secondary data, along with a comparative analysis of international laws, the study is grounded in the Pancasila theory of justice, the legal system theory, and law enforcement theory. The findings reveal that the existing regulation fails to ensure justice values, as the supervision by police investigators introduces potential conflicts of interest and limits PPNS's ability to act independently. Moreover, the lack of specialized nautical expertise among police investigators hinders thorough investigations. Identified weaknesses include insufficient qualification standards for PPNS, structural issues in the coordination and supervision framework fostering conflicts of interest, and a need for more awareness and understanding of nautical laws and procedures among both investigators and the public. To reform the regulation, it is essential to establish a balance and equality of authority between PPNS and police investigators, enhancing the role of PPNS based on their specialized nautical expertise. Consequently, revising Article 282 of Law Number 17 of 2008 is necessary to align with justice values, ensuring more independent and objective investigations in nautical incidents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars International Journal of Law Crime and Justice
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2024.v07i09.004
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstruction of the Regulation of Authority for Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) in Nautical Affairs for Handling Ship Accidents Based on Justice Values

Anis Mashdurohatun, Wolly Wolly
Scholars International Journal of Law Crime and Justice
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Reconstruction of the Regulation of Authority for Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) in Nautical Affairs for Handling Ship Accidents Based on Justice Values

Anis Mashdurohatun, Wolly Wolly
article en

Abstract

Indonesia, possessing the second-longest coastline globally, relies extensively on sea transportation, highlighting the necessity for proficient management of nautical incidents. The authority of Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) in nautical affairs is delineated in Article 282 of Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping. However, the current framework, which places PPNS under the supervision of police investigators, can lead to biased investigations due to the pressure to conform to police findings, thereby compromising the independence and objectivity of PPNS. This study aims to analyse and prove that the regulation of PPNS authority in handling ship accidents is not founded on justice values, identifying several critical weaknesses, and proposing reforms to address them. Using a socio-legal research approach and incorporating primary and secondary data, along with a comparative analysis of international laws, the study is grounded in the Pancasila theory of justice, the legal system theory, and law enforcement theory. The findings reveal that the existing regulation fails to ensure justice values, as the supervision by police investigators introduces potential conflicts of interest and limits PPNS's ability to act independently. Moreover, the lack of specialized nautical expertise among police investigators hinders thorough investigations. Identified weaknesses include insufficient qualification standards for PPNS, structural issues in the coordination and supervision framework fostering conflicts of interest, and a need for more awareness and understanding of nautical laws and procedures among both investigators and the public. To reform the regulation, it is essential to establish a balance and equality of authority between PPNS and police investigators, enhancing the role of PPNS based on their specialized nautical expertise. Consequently, revising Article 282 of Law Number 17 of 2008 is necessary to align with justice values, ensuring more independent and objective investigations in nautical incidents.

Scholars International Journal of Law Crime and JusticeVol. 7(09)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.