Legal Governance of Human Gene Editing Technology: From Single Governance to Multiple Governance

Human gene editing is a technology to accurately modify the human genome or transcription products. There are technical uncertainties in the practical application process, and it also brings ethical issues such as human subjectivity, autonomy, equality, and genetic determinism. Therefore, careful attention needs to be paid to the legal governance of this technology. In terms of specific governance measures, it is crucial to strictly distinguish between different types of gene editing behavior and establish a classified management mechanism. Somatic gene editing behavior should generally be allowed, subject to appropriate regulatory oversight. Germline gene editing should be opposed in principle and allowed only under exceptional circumstances. In addition, harnessing social forces and strengthening international cooperation are essential prerequisites for achieving effective governance of human gene editing technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biotechnology Law Report
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2024.86733.chen
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Governance of Human Gene Editing Technology: From Single Governance to Multiple Governance

Long Chen
Biotechnology Law Report
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Legal Governance of Human Gene Editing Technology: From Single Governance to Multiple Governance

Long Chen
article en

Abstract

Human gene editing is a technology to accurately modify the human genome or transcription products. There are technical uncertainties in the practical application process, and it also brings ethical issues such as human subjectivity, autonomy, equality, and genetic determinism. Therefore, careful attention needs to be paid to the legal governance of this technology. In terms of specific governance measures, it is crucial to strictly distinguish between different types of gene editing behavior and establish a classified management mechanism. Somatic gene editing behavior should generally be allowed, subject to appropriate regulatory oversight. Germline gene editing should be opposed in principle and allowed only under exceptional circumstances. In addition, harnessing social forces and strengthening international cooperation are essential prerequisites for achieving effective governance of human gene editing technology.

Biotechnology Law ReportVol. 43(6)
Center for Global Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.