Assessing Second Language Spoken Coherence

The current study trialed several methods of operationalizing perceived coherence in second language (L2) speech. Data were collected from 15 listeners who rated 49 recorded monologues for coherence. First, participants wrote self-reports justifying their ratings of three monologues. These self-reports were thematically analysed to identify salient points. Next, quantitative analysis was conducted on the listeners’ ratings of 46 monologues. Correlations were drawn between averaged coherence scores and 12 proficiency measures for fluency, cohesion, and lexicogrammatical performance. Significant correlations were found between perceived coherence and several fluency measures. Finally, correlations were drawn between listeners’ coherence ratings and their ratings of three sub-constructs (cohesion, topical unity, situational coherence/register). Although all three sub-constructs correlated overall with coherence ratings, there was a large variance between individual raters. Overall, these findings underline the multidimensionality of perceived coherence and the difficulty finding consensus on what features are most salient to its presence. This paper concludes with some recommendations for future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17154/kjal.2024.03.40.3.29
Primary Topic
Employee Welfare and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Second Language Spoken Coherence

Matthew C. Watterson
Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics
Employee Welfare and Language Studies
article

Assessing Second Language Spoken Coherence

Matthew C. Watterson
article en

Abstract

The current study trialed several methods of operationalizing perceived coherence in second language (L2) speech. Data were collected from 15 listeners who rated 49 recorded monologues for coherence. First, participants wrote self-reports justifying their ratings of three monologues. These self-reports were thematically analysed to identify salient points. Next, quantitative analysis was conducted on the listeners’ ratings of 46 monologues. Correlations were drawn between averaged coherence scores and 12 proficiency measures for fluency, cohesion, and lexicogrammatical performance. Significant correlations were found between perceived coherence and several fluency measures. Finally, correlations were drawn between listeners’ coherence ratings and their ratings of three sub-constructs (cohesion, topical unity, situational coherence/register). Although all three sub-constructs correlated overall with coherence ratings, there was a large variance between individual raters. Overall, these findings underline the multidimensionality of perceived coherence and the difficulty finding consensus on what features are most salient to its presence. This paper concludes with some recommendations for future research.

Korean Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 40(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Employee Welfare and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.