Considerations for Exploring Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) for Treatments of Cancer, Benign Skin Diseases, Atrial Fibrillation, and for New Mechanistic Understandings

Pulsed power includes acquiring electrical energy, compressing it, and releasing it in instantaneous bursts that are low in energy but very high in power. When the pulse duration is near the plasma membrane charging time constant, which is the time during which the cell interior is exposed to the applied pulsed electric field, it affects intracellular structures and functions. The technology is called nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs), nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP), or Nanopulse Stimulation (NPSTM) according to Pulse Biosciences, Inc., a company taking the technology to the market. Initial studies showed the elimination of tumor cells in vitro by apoptosis, and other regulated cell death mechanisms, elimination of rodent and canine osteosarcoma, and a basal cell carcinoma clinical trial. In the rat liver and mouse breast cancers, tumor-free animals were in situ vaccinated (ISV), preventing the recurrence of the treated cancers. The technology has also focused on treating benign skin diseases, with some advantages over cryoablation. More recently, the same technology called nanosecond pulsed-field ablation (nsPFA) has been used to treat cardiac arrhythmias like Atrial Fabulation (AFib) with catheters in humans. In pre-clinical studies and now in humans, this technology is showing advantages over radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. On a new mechanistic landscape, nonlethal nsPEFs modulation of electron transport in the plasma membrane and the mitochondria show potential for controlling redox homeostasis and metabolism. Furthermore, different nsPEF waveforms have different effects on cells; waveforms can differ by pulse duration, rise time, electric field, and/or post-pulse features. So, for nsPEFs, there is a lethal side used for ablation as with NPS and nsPFA and a more recently recognized nonlethal side indicating new possibilities to differentially modify cell physiology depending on the different nsPEF waveforms.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17352/rcb.000001
Primary Topic
Microbial Inactivation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerations for Exploring Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) for Treatments of Cancer, Benign Skin Diseases, Atrial Fibrillation, and for New Mechanistic Understandings

Beebe Stephen J
Microbial Inactivation Methods
article

Considerations for Exploring Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs) for Treatments of Cancer, Benign Skin Diseases, Atrial Fibrillation, and for New Mechanistic Understandings

Beebe Stephen J
article en

Abstract

Pulsed power includes acquiring electrical energy, compressing it, and releasing it in instantaneous bursts that are low in energy but very high in power. When the pulse duration is near the plasma membrane charging time constant, which is the time during which the cell interior is exposed to the applied pulsed electric field, it affects intracellular structures and functions. The technology is called nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields (nsPEFs), nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP), or Nanopulse Stimulation (NPSTM) according to Pulse Biosciences, Inc., a company taking the technology to the market. Initial studies showed the elimination of tumor cells in vitro by apoptosis, and other regulated cell death mechanisms, elimination of rodent and canine osteosarcoma, and a basal cell carcinoma clinical trial. In the rat liver and mouse breast cancers, tumor-free animals were in situ vaccinated (ISV), preventing the recurrence of the treated cancers. The technology has also focused on treating benign skin diseases, with some advantages over cryoablation. More recently, the same technology called nanosecond pulsed-field ablation (nsPFA) has been used to treat cardiac arrhythmias like Atrial Fabulation (AFib) with catheters in humans. In pre-clinical studies and now in humans, this technology is showing advantages over radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. On a new mechanistic landscape, nonlethal nsPEFs modulation of electron transport in the plasma membrane and the mitochondria show potential for controlling redox homeostasis and metabolism. Furthermore, different nsPEF waveforms have different effects on cells; waveforms can differ by pulse duration, rise time, electric field, and/or post-pulse features. So, for nsPEFs, there is a lethal side used for ablation as with NPS and nsPFA and a more recently recognized nonlethal side indicating new possibilities to differentially modify cell physiology depending on the different nsPEF waveforms.

Vol. 1(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Microbial Inactivation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.