Safe sites in the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic mini-screws: Tomographic study in different facial types

Objectives: The objective of this study was to verify safe sites on the mandibular buccal shelf (MBS) for extra-alveolar mini-screw insertion according to facial type. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 84 cone-beam computed tomography scans were equally divided into three groups according to the patient’s facial type: Group 1, hyperdivergent; Group 2, neutral; and Group 3, hypodivergent. The total buccal alveolar bone thickness was measured in five zones between the mesial root of the first molar and the distal root of the second molar, 3, 6, and 9 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Results: MBS areas with adequate thickness for temporary anchorage device (TAD) insertion were as follows: Group 1, second molar distal root 9 mm from the CEJ; Group 2, second molar distal root 6 and 9 mm from the CEJ; and Group 3, second molar mesial root 9 mm from the CEJ and second molar distal root 6 and 9 mm from the CEJ. Conclusion: The safe zones on the MBS for TAD insertion were located on the distal root of the second molar, 9 mm from the CEJ, for all facial types. For neutral and hypodivergent patients, the site located on the second molar distal root, 6 mm from CEJ, was included; for hypodivergent patients, the site located on the second molar mesial root, 9 mm from the CEJ, was included.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_79_2024
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safe sites in the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic mini-screws: Tomographic study in different facial types

José Rino Neto, Annelise Nazareth Cunha Ribeiro, João Batista de Paiva, Almir Lima et al.
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Safe sites in the mandibular buccal shelf for orthodontic mini-screws: Tomographic study in different facial types

José Rino Neto, Annelise Nazareth Cunha Ribeiro, João Batista de Paiva, Almir Lima, Rafael Gorghetto Domingos
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to verify safe sites on the mandibular buccal shelf (MBS) for extra-alveolar mini-screw insertion according to facial type. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 84 cone-beam computed tomography scans were equally divided into three groups according to the patient’s facial type: Group 1, hyperdivergent; Group 2, neutral; and Group 3, hypodivergent. The total buccal alveolar bone thickness was measured in five zones between the mesial root of the first molar and the distal root of the second molar, 3, 6, and 9 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Results: MBS areas with adequate thickness for temporary anchorage device (TAD) insertion were as follows: Group 1, second molar distal root 9 mm from the CEJ; Group 2, second molar distal root 6 and 9 mm from the CEJ; and Group 3, second molar mesial root 9 mm from the CEJ and second molar distal root 6 and 9 mm from the CEJ. Conclusion: The safe zones on the MBS for TAD insertion were located on the distal root of the second molar, 9 mm from the CEJ, for all facial types. For neutral and hypodivergent patients, the site located on the second molar distal root, 6 mm from CEJ, was included; for hypodivergent patients, the site located on the second molar mesial root, 9 mm from the CEJ, was included.

APOS Trends in OrthodonticsVol. 15
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.