Clinicians’ roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students

The study results highlight two different types among (future) clinicians regarding their view of the necessary levels of understanding and competence. These findings should inform the debate on appropriate training programmes and professional standards (e.g. clinical practice guidelines) that enable the safe and effective clinical employment of AI-CDSS in various clinical fields. While current approaches search for appropriate minimum requirements of the necessary understanding and competence, the differences between (future) clinicians in terms of their information and understanding needs described here can lead to more differentiated approaches to solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01109-w
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinicians’ roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students

Sabine Salloch, Florian Funer, Wolfgang Liedtke, Sara Tinnemeyer
5 citations
BMC Medical Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.60
article

Clinicians’ roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students

Sabine Salloch, Florian Funer, Wolfgang Liedtke, Sara Tinnemeyer
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The study results highlight two different types among (future) clinicians regarding their view of the necessary levels of understanding and competence. These findings should inform the debate on appropriate training programmes and professional standards (e.g. clinical practice guidelines) that enable the safe and effective clinical employment of AI-CDSS in various clinical fields. While current approaches search for appropriate minimum requirements of the necessary understanding and competence, the differences between (future) clinicians in terms of their information and understanding needs described here can lead to more differentiated approaches to solutions.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 25(1)
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Universität Greifswald (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinicians’ roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students — Sabine Salloch, Florian Funer, et al. · BMC Medical Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS