Do companies walk the talk? Commitments and actions in global supply chain labor standards

This article examines the efforts towards implementing minimum labor standards in global supply chains through the lens of corporate social responsibility. The adoption of supplier codes of conduct has driven efforts to monitor and enforce standards within these chains. Nonetheless, challenges persist in translating commitment into action, giving rise to gaps in implementation. We address two critical phenomena: corporations' varying internalization of responsibility to implement labor standards, and the translation of these written commitments into actions. Through two distinct studies, we explore how companies ‘walk the talk’, and navigate the gaps between corporate recognition of responsibility and the establishment of management systems to implement labor standards. The first study demonstrates that a minority of companies are diligent in committing to implement their codes. Only 17% accept a shared responsibility to implement the code, and most companies only refer to audit visits or the termination of supplier contract as mechanisms put in place. The second study does not find conclusive evidence of a correlation between corporate commitments and the evaluation of their corporate sustainability practices in supply chains as evaluated by KnowtheChain. However, results suggest that companies do better when they promote the collaborative approach with suppliers in their implementation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00103-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do companies walk the talk? Commitments and actions in global supply chain labor standards

Sarah Vandenbroucke, Yvonne Erkens, Jarosław Kantorowicz, Helen Pluut
1 citations
International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
0.55
article

Do companies walk the talk? Commitments and actions in global supply chain labor standards

Sarah Vandenbroucke, Yvonne Erkens, Jarosław Kantorowicz, Helen Pluut
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines the efforts towards implementing minimum labor standards in global supply chains through the lens of corporate social responsibility. The adoption of supplier codes of conduct has driven efforts to monitor and enforce standards within these chains. Nonetheless, challenges persist in translating commitment into action, giving rise to gaps in implementation. We address two critical phenomena: corporations' varying internalization of responsibility to implement labor standards, and the translation of these written commitments into actions. Through two distinct studies, we explore how companies ‘walk the talk’, and navigate the gaps between corporate recognition of responsibility and the establishment of management systems to implement labor standards. The first study demonstrates that a minority of companies are diligent in committing to implement their codes. Only 17% accept a shared responsibility to implement the code, and most companies only refer to audit visits or the termination of supplier contract as mechanisms put in place. The second study does not find conclusive evidence of a correlation between corporate commitments and the evaluation of their corporate sustainability practices in supply chains as evaluated by KnowtheChain. However, results suggest that companies do better when they promote the collaborative approach with suppliers in their implementation efforts.

International Journal of Corporate Social ResponsibilityVol. 9(1)
Leiden University (NL), Hague Institute for Global Justice (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.