What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates?

This study confirmed linear relationship between CoE and the probability of potentially 'true' estimates. We found that the probability of potentially "true" estimates decreases by about 20% for each drop in CoE (from about 80% for high to 55% for moderate to 35% to low and 15% to very low CoE).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14160
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates?

Despina Koletsi, David Nunan, Benjamin Djulbegović, Amy Price et al.
1 citations
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
0.46
article

What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates?

Despina Koletsi, David Nunan, Benjamin Djulbegović, Amy Price, Lars G. Hemkens, Iztok Hozo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study confirmed linear relationship between CoE and the probability of potentially 'true' estimates. We found that the probability of potentially "true" estimates decreases by about 20% for each drop in CoE (from about 80% for high to 55% for moderate to 35% to low and 15% to very low CoE).

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 31(3)
Dartmouth College (US), Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of Basel (CH), University of Zurich (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Indiana University Northwest (US), Nuffield Health (GB), Stanford University (US)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What is the probability that higher versus lower quality of evidence represents true effects estimates? — Despina Koletsi, David Nunan, et al. · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS