University Teachers’ Views on the Adoption and Integration of Generative AI Tools for Student Assessment in Higher Education

This study examines the factors that may impact the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools for students’ assessment in tertiary education from the perspective of early-adopter instructors in the Middle East. It utilized a self-administered online survey and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to collect data from 358 faculty members from different countries in the Middle East. The Smart PLS software 4 was used to analyze the data. The findings of this study revealed that educators developed new strategies to integrate Gen AI into assessment and used a systematic approach to develop assignments. Moreover, the study demonstrated the importance of developing institutional policies for the integration of Gen AI in education, as a driver factor influencing the use of Gen AI in assessments. Additionally, the research identified significant factors, namely performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influences, and hedonic motivation, shaping educators’ behavioral intentions and actual use of Gen AI tools to assess students’ performance. The findings reveal both the potential advantages of Gen AI, namely enhanced student engagement and reduced instructor workloads, and challenges, including concerns over academic integrity and the possible negative impact on students’ writing and thinking skills. This study emphasizes the significance of targeted professional development and ethical criteria for the proper integration of Gen AI in educational assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101090
Citations
97
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University Teachers’ Views on the Adoption and Integration of Generative AI Tools for Student Assessment in Higher Education

Bilal Tawfiq Hamamra, Zuheir N. Khlaif, Elias Bensalem, Muayad K. Hattab et al.
97 citations
Education Sciences
Online Learning and Analytics
39.95
article

University Teachers’ Views on the Adoption and Integration of Generative AI Tools for Student Assessment in Higher Education

Bilal Tawfiq Hamamra, Zuheir N. Khlaif, Elias Bensalem, Muayad K. Hattab, Abed Alkarim Ayyoub, Ahmad Ayyoub, Mohamed A. A. Mitwally, Fadi Shadid
article en
97 citations

Abstract

This study examines the factors that may impact the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools for students’ assessment in tertiary education from the perspective of early-adopter instructors in the Middle East. It utilized a self-administered online survey and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to collect data from 358 faculty members from different countries in the Middle East. The Smart PLS software 4 was used to analyze the data. The findings of this study revealed that educators developed new strategies to integrate Gen AI into assessment and used a systematic approach to develop assignments. Moreover, the study demonstrated the importance of developing institutional policies for the integration of Gen AI in education, as a driver factor influencing the use of Gen AI in assessments. Additionally, the research identified significant factors, namely performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influences, and hedonic motivation, shaping educators’ behavioral intentions and actual use of Gen AI tools to assess students’ performance. The findings reveal both the potential advantages of Gen AI, namely enhanced student engagement and reduced instructor workloads, and challenges, including concerns over academic integrity and the possible negative impact on students’ writing and thinking skills. This study emphasizes the significance of targeted professional development and ethical criteria for the proper integration of Gen AI in educational assessment.

Education SciencesVol. 14(10)
Northern Border University (SA), Bethlehem University (PS), University of South Africa (ZA), An-Najah National University (PS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Online Learning and Analytics
39.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.