Development and justification of a method for presenting radiation risks associated with medical exposure of patients

The practical implementation of radiation protection principles in the medical exposure of patients often tends to fall into one of two extremes: either excessive simplification of the methodology for assessing radiation health detriment, or its excessive complexity. An example of an excessively simplified approach is the assessment of radiation risk to patients using effective dose and radiation damage coefficients (nominal risk coefficients) as presented in Norms of the Radiation Safety NRB-99/2009. An example of an unjustifiably complex approach can be considered Tables 1-2 in MR 2.6.1.0215-20 "Assessment of radiation risk to patients during X-ray diagnostic radiological examinations," which indicate "lifetime risk values of death taking into account harm from reduced quality of life due to cancer of various organs and tissues and genetic effects from medical examinations" for a wide range of medical diagnostic X-ray radiological examinations in five-year age groups of patients. The main shortcomings of the simplified approach can be considered the lack of differences in risk assessment between individuals of different sexes and ages, although the fact of higher radiosensitivity in children compared to adults and in women compared to men can be considered universally recognized. The risk assessment approach proposed in MR 2.6.1.0215-20 addresses these shortcomings. However, in the view of the authors of this study, it offers an unnecessarily detailed picture considering uncertainties inherent in risk assessments at low doses, as well as uncertainties in the method of interpopulation transfer of radiation risk proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. The aim of this study was to develop and justify a simpler and more straightforward method of presenting information on radiation risks associated with medical X-ray radiological examinations, free from the main drawbacks of the two aforementioned methods. To achieve this goal, radiation risks were calculated using two methods (using effective dose and using the risk model of the International Commission on Radiological Protection). A comparative analysis of the calculation results was conducted with estimates presented in Tables 1-2 of MR 2.6.1.0215-20. As a result of the analysis, an original applied method for presenting qualitative characteristics of radiation risks was developed for use in prescribing X-ray radiological examinations and informing patients about potential health risks. The practical outcome of the study is the formation of a table of radiation risks associated with conducting studies on patients from the Russian population, using the developed method of presenting information on radiation risks.