Comment on “A Special Topic Class in Chemistry on Feminism and Science as a Tool to Disrupt the Dysconcious Racism in STEM”

In 2023, Reyes et al. published “A Special Topic Class in Chemistry on Feminism and Science as a Tool to Disrupt the Dysconcious Racism in STEM” ( J. Chem. Educ. 2023, 100, 112−117). In this commentary, we provide criticism on the following points: (1) the claim this course can “dismantle White Supremacy in Chemistry” in the absence of valid evidence that “White Supremacy” exists in chemistry, (2) the paucity of content directly related to chemistry and evangelization of a sociological perspective amounting to political indoctrination, and (3) the inclusion of a flawed, statistically meaningless evaluation methodology for the course. It is our opinion that this course and those like it, which substitute dogma in place of cultivating critical, independent analytical skills, fail STEM students. It is our further opinion that this publication has failed to conform to the standards of the JCE, which requires validated and reliable evaluation methods, meaningful data analysis, and relevant content with clear unambiguous course objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00521
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comment on “A Special Topic Class in Chemistry on Feminism and Science as a Tool to Disrupt the Dysconcious Racism in STEM”

John T. Landrum, Joseph Lichter
1 citations
Journal of Chemical Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
2.10
article

Comment on “A Special Topic Class in Chemistry on Feminism and Science as a Tool to Disrupt the Dysconcious Racism in STEM”

John T. Landrum, Joseph Lichter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 2023, Reyes et al. published “A Special Topic Class in Chemistry on Feminism and Science as a Tool to Disrupt the Dysconcious Racism in STEM” ( J. Chem. Educ. 2023, 100, 112−117). In this commentary, we provide criticism on the following points: (1) the claim this course can “dismantle White Supremacy in Chemistry” in the absence of valid evidence that “White Supremacy” exists in chemistry, (2) the paucity of content directly related to chemistry and evangelization of a sociological perspective amounting to political indoctrination, and (3) the inclusion of a flawed, statistically meaningless evaluation methodology for the course. It is our opinion that this course and those like it, which substitute dogma in place of cultivating critical, independent analytical skills, fail STEM students. It is our further opinion that this publication has failed to conform to the standards of the JCE, which requires validated and reliable evaluation methods, meaningful data analysis, and relevant content with clear unambiguous course objectives.

Journal of Chemical EducationVol. 101(11)
Florida International University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Science Education and Pedagogy
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.