SSI‐induced seismic earth pressures on an integral abutment bridge model: Experimental measurements versus numerical simulations and code provisions

Abstract Integral abutment bridges (IABs) generate strong soil–structure interaction (SSI) effects due to their high structural stiffness and transmission of inertial and thermal loads generated at the deck directly to the abutments. Despite an increasing number of experimental and numerical studies available in the literature, there is a lack of consolidated methodologies to model dynamic SSI phenomena for IABs, particularly in seismic regions where uncertainties associated with the induced ground motions render the problem harder to tackle. This study proposes an advanced strategy to model the seismic response of IABs, accounting for dynamic interaction between the structure, the abutment and the foundation, including piles and earth retaining walls. To this end, detailed finite‐element studies were carried out employing OpenSees to simulate a recent experimental campaign on a scaled IAB model in a soil container (SERENA) carried out at EQUALS Lab, University of Bristol, in the framework of SERA/H2020 project. An extensive dataset in terms of recorded accelerations, displacements, strains and settlements are available from these tests, including earth pressures which are back‐calculated from bending strain measurements. The objectives of this paper are threefold: firstly, the model parameters are explored and assessed critically by comparing the results from the numerical simulations against the experimental data; secondly, once the model is deemed sufficiently representative of the experiments, earth pressures are obtained numerically, as these are not directly measured in the tests; thirdly, the estimated static and dynamic earth pressures on the abutment wall are compared with the predictions of two simplified analytical procedures currently under consideration for inclusion in the new Eurocode 8. The results indicate that records and predictions match well for frequencies of up to 40 Hz at model scale (about 8 Hz in prototype scale) and confirm that the proposed modelling strategy can be used in practical applications. The quasi‐elastic model proposed in this study is shown to provide dependable predictions for cases involving moderate strains in real‐life applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4237
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SSI‐induced seismic earth pressures on an integral abutment bridge model: Experimental measurements versus numerical simulations and code provisions

Gabriele Fiorentino, Camillo Nuti, Raffaele De Risi, Bruno Briseghella et al.
5 citations
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
1.30
article

SSI‐induced seismic earth pressures on an integral abutment bridge model: Experimental measurements versus numerical simulations and code provisions

Gabriele Fiorentino, Camillo Nuti, Raffaele De Risi, Bruno Briseghella, Flavia De Luca, Anastasios Sextos, George Mylonakis
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Integral abutment bridges (IABs) generate strong soil–structure interaction (SSI) effects due to their high structural stiffness and transmission of inertial and thermal loads generated at the deck directly to the abutments. Despite an increasing number of experimental and numerical studies available in the literature, there is a lack of consolidated methodologies to model dynamic SSI phenomena for IABs, particularly in seismic regions where uncertainties associated with the induced ground motions render the problem harder to tackle. This study proposes an advanced strategy to model the seismic response of IABs, accounting for dynamic interaction between the structure, the abutment and the foundation, including piles and earth retaining walls. To this end, detailed finite‐element studies were carried out employing OpenSees to simulate a recent experimental campaign on a scaled IAB model in a soil container (SERENA) carried out at EQUALS Lab, University of Bristol, in the framework of SERA/H2020 project. An extensive dataset in terms of recorded accelerations, displacements, strains and settlements are available from these tests, including earth pressures which are back‐calculated from bending strain measurements. The objectives of this paper are threefold: firstly, the model parameters are explored and assessed critically by comparing the results from the numerical simulations against the experimental data; secondly, once the model is deemed sufficiently representative of the experiments, earth pressures are obtained numerically, as these are not directly measured in the tests; thirdly, the estimated static and dynamic earth pressures on the abutment wall are compared with the predictions of two simplified analytical procedures currently under consideration for inclusion in the new Eurocode 8. The results indicate that records and predictions match well for frequencies of up to 40 Hz at model scale (about 8 Hz in prototype scale) and confirm that the proposed modelling strategy can be used in practical applications. The quasi‐elastic model proposed in this study is shown to provide dependable predictions for cases involving moderate strains in real‐life applications.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsVol. 53(15)
Roma Tre University (IT), National Technical University of Athens (GR), Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), University of Bristol (GB), Institute of Environmental Geology and Geoengineering (IT), National Research Council (IT), Fuzhou University (CN)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.