Foraging bee species differentially prioritize quantity and quality of floral rewards

Pollinator-plant interactions represent a core mutualism that underpins biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems, and the loss of flowering plants is a major driver of pollinator declines. Bee attraction to flowers is mediated by both quantity of resources (the number of available flowers for exploration) and quality of resources (pollen nutritional value), but whether and how bees prioritize these factors is not well understood. Here, we leveraged a unique plant system to investigate the floral factors influencing bee foraging decisions. Recombinant inbred plant lines were generated by crossing the self-fertilizing <i>Capsella rubella</i> and the pollinator-dependent outcrosser <i>C. grandiflora</i>, to produce plants that varied across floral traits. Using enclosed arenas, we evaluated the foraging behavior of two solitary bee species, <i>Osmia cornifrons</i> and <i>Megachile rotundata</i>, to the isolated inflorescences from these lines. Visits from <i>O. cornifrons</i> were significantly positively correlated with the number of flowers, while <i>M. rotundata</i> visits were significantly positively associated with pollen nutrition, with a preference for plants with higher pollen protein-to-lipid content. Further experiments using artificial flowers confirmed that <i>M. rotundata</i> preferred flowers with higher protein:lipid ratios, while <i>O. cornifrons</i> visits were unaffected by nutrition. These studies demonstrate that, although both bee species collect pollen as their sole source of protein and lipids for themselves and/or their offspring, they differentially prioritize resource quantity (number of flowers) and quality (pollen nutritional content). These studies lay the groundwork for understanding how different foraging strategies evolved, and influence, plant-pollinator ecological networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae443
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foraging bee species differentially prioritize quantity and quality of floral rewards

Christina M. Grozinger, Pierre Ouvrard, Natalie K. Boyle, Jaya Sravanthi Mokkapati et al.
11 citations
PNAS Nexus
Plant and animal studies
11.32
article

Foraging bee species differentially prioritize quantity and quality of floral rewards

Christina M. Grozinger, Pierre Ouvrard, Natalie K. Boyle, Jaya Sravanthi Mokkapati, Adrien Sicard, M. N. Hill
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Pollinator-plant interactions represent a core mutualism that underpins biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems, and the loss of flowering plants is a major driver of pollinator declines. Bee attraction to flowers is mediated by both quantity of resources (the number of available flowers for exploration) and quality of resources (pollen nutritional value), but whether and how bees prioritize these factors is not well understood. Here, we leveraged a unique plant system to investigate the floral factors influencing bee foraging decisions. Recombinant inbred plant lines were generated by crossing the self-fertilizing <i>Capsella rubella</i> and the pollinator-dependent outcrosser <i>C. grandiflora</i>, to produce plants that varied across floral traits. Using enclosed arenas, we evaluated the foraging behavior of two solitary bee species, <i>Osmia cornifrons</i> and <i>Megachile rotundata</i>, to the isolated inflorescences from these lines. Visits from <i>O. cornifrons</i> were significantly positively correlated with the number of flowers, while <i>M. rotundata</i> visits were significantly positively associated with pollen nutrition, with a preference for plants with higher pollen protein-to-lipid content. Further experiments using artificial flowers confirmed that <i>M. rotundata</i> preferred flowers with higher protein:lipid ratios, while <i>O. cornifrons</i> visits were unaffected by nutrition. These studies demonstrate that, although both bee species collect pollen as their sole source of protein and lipids for themselves and/or their offspring, they differentially prioritize resource quantity (number of flowers) and quality (pollen nutritional content). These studies lay the groundwork for understanding how different foraging strategies evolved, and influence, plant-pollinator ecological networks.

PNAS NexusVol. 3(10)
Uppsala University (SE), Pennsylvania State University (US), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Human Frontier Science Program, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant and animal studies
11.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.