Random‐positioned‐sampling effect on probabilistic seismic demand modeling of modularized suspended buildings with free‐standing objects and architectural function regioning

Abstract The definition of the targeted engineering demand parameters (EDPs) is important to probabilistic seismic demand modeling (PSDM), which produces probability density functions of EDPs conditioned on seismic intensity measure (IM). The targeted EDPs are usually defined at the group level to account for multiple components/units. Thus, they are affected by the considered range of units, i.e., the sample positions. For instance, the maximum peak floor acceleration (PFA) within the whole building differs from the maximum among only the important positions related to seismic loss. Additional uncertainties are induced in the PSDM of PFA if the sample positions vary when architectural function and non‐structural elements change. In this study, the aforementioned influence is termed random‐positioned‐sampling (RPS) effect, and it is investigated by targeting a modularized suspended building, which features the tuning mechanism, multiple major modes, uneven response envelopes, and notable non‐structural‐object‐structure interactions (NSOSI). Results show that the RPS effect lowers the maximum‐based group‐level EDP and increases the dispersion within the EDP sample sets, indicating that conventional PSDMs without considering the RPS effect are biased. The significance of the influence is positively correlated to the position‐wise coefficient of variation of EDP but negatively correlated to the density of sample positions. The combined influence of the NSOSI and the RPS effect is two‐sided for PSDM. The NSOSI amplifies the RPS effect via enlarging position‐wise dispersion of EDP, whereas, the RPS effect waives part of the detrimental scattered contributions from NSOSI. Overall, the IM performance is handicapped, even with IM optimization. However, it can be compensated if architectural function region information is acquired beforehand since the sample positions are restrained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4241
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Random‐positioned‐sampling effect on probabilistic seismic demand modeling of modularized suspended buildings with free‐standing objects and architectural function regioning

Zhihang Ye, Xuanting Liu
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Random‐positioned‐sampling effect on probabilistic seismic demand modeling of modularized suspended buildings with free‐standing objects and architectural function regioning

Zhihang Ye, Xuanting Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract The definition of the targeted engineering demand parameters (EDPs) is important to probabilistic seismic demand modeling (PSDM), which produces probability density functions of EDPs conditioned on seismic intensity measure (IM). The targeted EDPs are usually defined at the group level to account for multiple components/units. Thus, they are affected by the considered range of units, i.e., the sample positions. For instance, the maximum peak floor acceleration (PFA) within the whole building differs from the maximum among only the important positions related to seismic loss. Additional uncertainties are induced in the PSDM of PFA if the sample positions vary when architectural function and non‐structural elements change. In this study, the aforementioned influence is termed random‐positioned‐sampling (RPS) effect, and it is investigated by targeting a modularized suspended building, which features the tuning mechanism, multiple major modes, uneven response envelopes, and notable non‐structural‐object‐structure interactions (NSOSI). Results show that the RPS effect lowers the maximum‐based group‐level EDP and increases the dispersion within the EDP sample sets, indicating that conventional PSDMs without considering the RPS effect are biased. The significance of the influence is positively correlated to the position‐wise coefficient of variation of EDP but negatively correlated to the density of sample positions. The combined influence of the NSOSI and the RPS effect is two‐sided for PSDM. The NSOSI amplifies the RPS effect via enlarging position‐wise dispersion of EDP, whereas, the RPS effect waives part of the detrimental scattered contributions from NSOSI. Overall, the IM performance is handicapped, even with IM optimization. However, it can be compensated if architectural function region information is acquired beforehand since the sample positions are restrained.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsVol. 54(1)
Shantou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.