Social Washing in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Firms

The growing importance of social sustainability fosters firms to communicate their social impact, e.g., through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting. Unfortunately, firms’ actions are often not consistent with their communication. When action and communication on social sustainability are incongruent, social washing emerges. This paper aims to provide an exploratory analysis, based on multiple case studies, to investigate the dimensions and practices of social washing in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms. The results reveal that the main social washing practices in AEC are misleading assessment of impacts, cherry-picking, inadequate or absent involvement of the local community, and concealment of modern slavery. We propose a framework for operationalizing the analysis of social washing practices in AEC firms. Finally, we provide an overview of the dimensions and practices of social washing, laying the groundwork for future studies on the topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management in Engineering
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-6095
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Washing in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Firms

Giorgio Locatelli, Tristano Sainati, Ilaria Zagaria, Giacomo Dei
6 citations
Journal of Management in Engineering
Management and Organizational Studies
4.05
article

Social Washing in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Firms

Giorgio Locatelli, Tristano Sainati, Ilaria Zagaria, Giacomo Dei
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The growing importance of social sustainability fosters firms to communicate their social impact, e.g., through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting. Unfortunately, firms’ actions are often not consistent with their communication. When action and communication on social sustainability are incongruent, social washing emerges. This paper aims to provide an exploratory analysis, based on multiple case studies, to investigate the dimensions and practices of social washing in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms. The results reveal that the main social washing practices in AEC are misleading assessment of impacts, cherry-picking, inadequate or absent involvement of the local community, and concealment of modern slavery. We propose a framework for operationalizing the analysis of social washing practices in AEC firms. Finally, we provide an overview of the dimensions and practices of social washing, laying the groundwork for future studies on the topic.

Journal of Management in EngineeringVol. 41(1)
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Management and Organizational Studies
4.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social Washing in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Firms — Giorgio Locatelli, Tristano Sainati, et al. · Journal of Management in Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS