Not all that glitters is green: empirical evidence from the Eurostoxx600 on stakeholders’ perception of greenwashing

Abstract Greenwashing refers to the deceptive practice where a company exaggerates or misrepresents the sustainability of its actions or projects. Given the ambiguity surrounding the methodologies behind conventional ratings, we enquire their robustness through the implementation of an alternative comprehensive measure entailing both internally disclosed and externally generated data. We address a notorious critique in greenwashing research—that the entire voluntary CSR approach inadvertently facilitates the diffusion of greenwashing. We make a unique contribution to the statistical methodology by breaking down the difference between internal and external perception of sustainability through regression analysis. We claim that only when the presence of CSR Committees is coupled with tangible initiatives boosting sustainability, both external and internal stakeholders are found to positively evaluate the sustainable commitment of a company.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Data Science and Analytics
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-024-00641-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not all that glitters is green: empirical evidence from the Eurostoxx600 on stakeholders’ perception of greenwashing

Paola Cerchiello, Yana Kostiuk, Costanza Bosone
1 citations
International Journal of Data Science and Analytics
Environmental Sustainability in Business
0.44
article

Not all that glitters is green: empirical evidence from the Eurostoxx600 on stakeholders’ perception of greenwashing

Paola Cerchiello, Yana Kostiuk, Costanza Bosone
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Greenwashing refers to the deceptive practice where a company exaggerates or misrepresents the sustainability of its actions or projects. Given the ambiguity surrounding the methodologies behind conventional ratings, we enquire their robustness through the implementation of an alternative comprehensive measure entailing both internally disclosed and externally generated data. We address a notorious critique in greenwashing research—that the entire voluntary CSR approach inadvertently facilitates the diffusion of greenwashing. We make a unique contribution to the statistical methodology by breaking down the difference between internal and external perception of sustainability through regression analysis. We claim that only when the presence of CSR Committees is coupled with tangible initiatives boosting sustainability, both external and internal stakeholders are found to positively evaluate the sustainable commitment of a company.

International Journal of Data Science and AnalyticsVol. 20(3)
University of Pavia (IT), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT)
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
0.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.