High-Accuracy Positivity-Preserving Finite Difference Approximations of the Chemotaxis Model for Tumor Invasion
Numerical simulation of the complex evolution process for tumor invasion plays an extremely important role in-depth exploring the bio-taxis phenomena of tumor growth and metastasis. In view of the fact that low-accuracy numerical methods often have large errors and low resolution, very refined grids have to be used if we want to get high-resolution simulating results, which leads to a great deal of computational cost. In this paper, we are committed to developing a class of high-accuracy positivity-preserving finite difference methods to solve the chemotaxis model for tumor invasion. First, two unconditionally stable implicit compact difference schemes for solving the model are proposed; second, the local truncation errors of the new schemes are analyzed, which show that they have second-order accuracy in time and fourth-order accuracy in space; third, based on the proposed schemes, the high-accuracy numerical integration idea of binary functions is employed to structure a linear compact weighting formula that guarantees fourth-order accuracy and nonnegative, and then a positivity-preserving and time-marching algorithm is established; and finally, the accuracy, stability, and positivity-preserving of the proposed methods are verified by several numerical experiments, and the evolution phenomena of tumor invasion over time are numerically simulated and analyzed.
Authors
- J. Peng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3847-2732)
- Haiyang Li
- Lin Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0502-5314)
- Yongbin Ge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4071-1937)
- Yuchao Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4404-9952)
Institutions
- Guangzhou University (CN)
- Dalian Minzu University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Published
- 2024-10-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2023.0316
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.58