Nonprojective Bell-state measurements

The Bell-state measurement (BSM) is the projection of two qubits onto four orthogonal maximally entangled states. Here we first propose how to appropriately define more general BSMs, which have more than four possible outcomes, and then study whether they exist in quantum theory. We observe that nonprojective BSMs can be defined in a systematic way in terms of equiangular tight frames of maximally entangled states, i.e., a set of maximally entangled states, where every pair is equally, and in a sense maximally, distinguishable. We show that there exists a five-outcome BSM through an explicit construction and find that it admits a simple geometric representation. Then we prove that there exists no larger BSM on two qubits by showing that no six-outcome BSM is possible. We also determine the most distinguishable set of six equiangular maximally entangled states and show that it falls only somewhat short of forming a valid quantum measurement. Finally, we study the nonprojective BSM in the contexts of both local state discrimination and entanglement-assisted quantum communication. Our results put forward natural forms of nonprojective joint measurements and provide insight into the geometry of entangled quantum states. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.110.042206
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonprojective Bell-state measurements

Armin Tavakoli, Gabriele Cobucci, Amanda Wei
1 citations
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
0.34
article

Nonprojective Bell-state measurements

Armin Tavakoli, Gabriele Cobucci, Amanda Wei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Bell-state measurement (BSM) is the projection of two qubits onto four orthogonal maximally entangled states. Here we first propose how to appropriately define more general BSMs, which have more than four possible outcomes, and then study whether they exist in quantum theory. We observe that nonprojective BSMs can be defined in a systematic way in terms of equiangular tight frames of maximally entangled states, i.e., a set of maximally entangled states, where every pair is equally, and in a sense maximally, distinguishable. We show that there exists a five-outcome BSM through an explicit construction and find that it admits a simple geometric representation. Then we prove that there exists no larger BSM on two qubits by showing that no six-outcome BSM is possible. We also determine the most distinguishable set of six equiangular maximally entangled states and show that it falls only somewhat short of forming a valid quantum measurement. Finally, we study the nonprojective BSM in the contexts of both local state discrimination and entanglement-assisted quantum communication. Our results put forward natural forms of nonprojective joint measurements and provide insight into the geometry of entangled quantum states. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical review. A/Physical review, AVol. 110(4)
Lund University (SE)
Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet, Wallenberg Center for Quantum Technology, Chalmers University of Technology
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.