Racial Differences in Pain Assessment and False Beliefs About Race in AI Models

This comparative effectiveness research study examines the association between racial differences in pain assessment and false beliefs about biologization of race by large language models compared with a human baseline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37977
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial Differences in Pain Assessment and False Beliefs About Race in AI Models

Adam Rodman, Brototo Deb
5 citations
JAMA Network Open
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.71
article

Racial Differences in Pain Assessment and False Beliefs About Race in AI Models

Adam Rodman, Brototo Deb
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This comparative effectiveness research study examines the association between racial differences in pain assessment and false beliefs about biologization of race by large language models compared with a human baseline.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 7(10)
MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Georgetown University (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.