Post-trial access practice in malaria, tuberculosis, and NTDs clinical trial studies in Sub-Saharan African countries, quantitative study

<ns4:p>Background According to CIOMS, 2016 post-trial access (PTA) refers to the ethical imperative that requires the sponsor, researchers, and relevant public health authority, "to make available as soon as possible any intervention or product developed, and knowledge generated, for the population or community in which the research is carried out." PTA is stipulated and recommended by different international research guidelines like CIOMS, and it was acknowledged that PTA should be accessible to those who actively participated in the trial study and the community and/or host country. Law, policy, and practical guidance for PTA has so far been vague but has recently attracted and increased attention in the context of benefit sharing of scientific research results with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Even though the number of clinical trials conducted in the Sub-Saharan countries has increased in the past two decades, PTA plan and practice is underreported or very low. Objective to evaluate PTA plan and implementation practice on TB, Malaria and NTD clinical trial studies conducted in the sub-Saharan African countries. Method a quantitative, cross sectional study survey approach is used to evaluate the PTA plan and practice of PI, trial coordinators, and sponsors in Sub-Saharan African countries. Finding misunderstanding of the term PTA, lack of plan, discussion, and arrangement on PTA between research stakeholders. Conclusion PTA training should be prepared and facilitated for researchers, IRB members, PIs, funders, and sponsors; discussion and arrangement on PTA should be done before the conduct of the trial; and there should be written agreement between the parties to guarantee PTA to study participants and community after the end of the trial study.</ns4:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18175.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-trial access practice in malaria, tuberculosis, and NTDs clinical trial studies in Sub-Saharan African countries, quantitative study

Ibrahim Mdala, Yemisrach Seralegne, Hawult Taye, Martha Zewdie et al.
1 citations
Open Research Europe
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
article

Post-trial access practice in malaria, tuberculosis, and NTDs clinical trial studies in Sub-Saharan African countries, quantitative study

Ibrahim Mdala, Yemisrach Seralegne, Hawult Taye, Martha Zewdie, Cynthia Khamala Wangamati, Rosemarie de la Cruz Bernabe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<ns4:p>Background According to CIOMS, 2016 post-trial access (PTA) refers to the ethical imperative that requires the sponsor, researchers, and relevant public health authority, "to make available as soon as possible any intervention or product developed, and knowledge generated, for the population or community in which the research is carried out." PTA is stipulated and recommended by different international research guidelines like CIOMS, and it was acknowledged that PTA should be accessible to those who actively participated in the trial study and the community and/or host country. Law, policy, and practical guidance for PTA has so far been vague but has recently attracted and increased attention in the context of benefit sharing of scientific research results with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Even though the number of clinical trials conducted in the Sub-Saharan countries has increased in the past two decades, PTA plan and practice is underreported or very low. Objective to evaluate PTA plan and implementation practice on TB, Malaria and NTD clinical trial studies conducted in the sub-Saharan African countries. Method a quantitative, cross sectional study survey approach is used to evaluate the PTA plan and practice of PI, trial coordinators, and sponsors in Sub-Saharan African countries. Finding misunderstanding of the term PTA, lack of plan, discussion, and arrangement on PTA between research stakeholders. Conclusion PTA training should be prepared and facilitated for researchers, IRB members, PIs, funders, and sponsors; discussion and arrangement on PTA should be done before the conduct of the trial; and there should be written agreement between the parties to guarantee PTA to study participants and community after the end of the trial study.</ns4:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 4
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.