Material hardship and use of social safety net programs among LGBT adults and their families

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people experience higher levels of economic insecurity and poverty compared to non-LGBT people. Social safety net programs may reduce this disparity, but the uptake of these programs among LGBT adults has rarely been assessed. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the 2018-2020 Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey to compare differences in material hardship and social safety net program utilization between LGBT and non- LGBT adults in the United States. LGBT participants were more likely to report lack of an emergency fund, food insecurity, utilities hardship, medical hardship, and multiple material hardships. LGBT adults had higher odds compared to non- LGBT adults of using SNAP, income- or disability-based insurance, SSI or SSDI, and housing assistance. There were no differences in use of WIC, reduced-price/free school lunch benefits, or charitable food. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the social safety net programs for reducing material hardship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12432
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Material hardship and use of social safety net programs among LGBT adults and their families

John R. Blosnich, Maiya Hotchkiss, Emmett R. Henderson, Clarisse A. Lin
1 citations
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
0.64
article

Material hardship and use of social safety net programs among LGBT adults and their families

John R. Blosnich, Maiya Hotchkiss, Emmett R. Henderson, Clarisse A. Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people experience higher levels of economic insecurity and poverty compared to non-LGBT people. Social safety net programs may reduce this disparity, but the uptake of these programs among LGBT adults has rarely been assessed. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the 2018-2020 Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey to compare differences in material hardship and social safety net program utilization between LGBT and non- LGBT adults in the United States. LGBT participants were more likely to report lack of an emergency fund, food insecurity, utilities hardship, medical hardship, and multiple material hardships. LGBT adults had higher odds compared to non- LGBT adults of using SNAP, income- or disability-based insurance, SSI or SSDI, and housing assistance. There were no differences in use of WIC, reduced-price/free school lunch benefits, or charitable food. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the social safety net programs for reducing material hardship.

Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVol. 25(1)
University of Southern California (US), University of Pittsburgh (US)
National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.