Improved SCS-CN Methodology Incorporating Storm Duration and Temporally Decaying Retention for Enhanced Runoff Prediction

This study presents novel mathematical formulations of the Soil Conservation Service curve number (SCS-CN) method that incorporate both temporally decaying retention parameters and storm intensity/duration. To evaluate its performance, we compared it with the existing versions of the SCS-CN model using a large data set of 35,546 storm events of 113 different US watersheds. Obtained results indicate that the proposed model outperforms other models in almost all 113 US watersheds with the highest Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). Furthermore, the results are supported by the percent bias (PBIAS) being close to 0 and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE), RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) statistics. The general form of the proposed model performed particularly well in clayey and sandy soils with different land uses and catchment areas larger than 1 ha. Rainfall (P) and the coefficient (β) parameters are identified as the most and least sensitive parameters of the proposed model, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jhyeff.heeng-6257
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved SCS-CN Methodology Incorporating Storm Duration and Temporally Decaying Retention for Enhanced Runoff Prediction

Ravindra Kumar Verma, Ankit Agarwal, Nand Kishore Sharma, Sangeeta Verma et al.
3 citations
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.60
article

Improved SCS-CN Methodology Incorporating Storm Duration and Temporally Decaying Retention for Enhanced Runoff Prediction

Ravindra Kumar Verma, Ankit Agarwal, Nand Kishore Sharma, Sangeeta Verma, Surendra Kumar Mishra
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study presents novel mathematical formulations of the Soil Conservation Service curve number (SCS-CN) method that incorporate both temporally decaying retention parameters and storm intensity/duration. To evaluate its performance, we compared it with the existing versions of the SCS-CN model using a large data set of 35,546 storm events of 113 different US watersheds. Obtained results indicate that the proposed model outperforms other models in almost all 113 US watersheds with the highest Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). Furthermore, the results are supported by the percent bias (PBIAS) being close to 0 and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE), RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) statistics. The general form of the proposed model performed particularly well in clayey and sandy soils with different land uses and catchment areas larger than 1 ha. Rainfall (P) and the coefficient (β) parameters are identified as the most and least sensitive parameters of the proposed model, respectively.

Journal of Hydrologic EngineeringVol. 29(6)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN), National Institute of Hydrology (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improved SCS-CN Methodology Incorporating Storm Duration and Temporally Decaying Retention for Enhanced Runoff Prediction — Ravindra Kumar Verma, Ankit Agarwal, et al. · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS