Data Mining for Community Resilience: Understanding Stakeholder Value Systems across Communities in the State of Florida

Achieving community resilience is a complex task, as there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach that can be applied uniformly across all communities. Communities with unique characteristics (e.g., geographic, demographic, and social vulnerabilities) require tailored resilience strategies aligned with their stakeholders’ values and priorities. Stakeholder values refer to the things that are of importance, merit, and provide utilities to stakeholders, and stakeholders from different communities may hold values with varying degrees of importance, forming their own distinct value systems. Despite the abundance of research on stakeholder engagement in resilience planning, there remains a limited understanding of what stakeholders value or prioritize in resilience planning. To address this gap, our study examined stakeholder value systems and analyzed how the value systems vary across different communities (e.g., coastal versus inland; metropolitan versus nonmetropolitan; more versus less socially vulnerable). We used a semisupervised learning algorithm—Anchored correlation explanation (anchored CorEx)—to analyze the social media data from Twitter collected within the Florida communities. We found that: (1) physical built environment resilience values were ranked the highest, followed by environmental, social, and economic resilience values; (2) structural robustness and integrity, resource efficiency, comfort and health, and financial support were the highest-ranked values in the physical built environment, environmental, social, and economic resilience categories, respectively; (3) stakeholders from different communities had significant variations in their prioritizations of certain values (e.g., resource efficiency, beneficial land use); and (4) values such as structural robustness and integrity and resource efficiency require more attention in community resilience planning. The findings of this study could facilitate stakeholder-centered and community-specific resilience planning by tailoring resilience practices to the unique value systems held by community stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Hazards Review
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-1894
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Mining for Community Resilience: Understanding Stakeholder Value Systems across Communities in the State of Florida

Hang Ren, Arif Mohaimin Sadri, N. Emel Ganapati, Travis A. Whetsell et al.
6 citations
Natural Hazards Review
Disaster Management and Resilience
6.79
article

Data Mining for Community Resilience: Understanding Stakeholder Value Systems across Communities in the State of Florida

Hang Ren, Arif Mohaimin Sadri, N. Emel Ganapati, Travis A. Whetsell, Lu Zhang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Achieving community resilience is a complex task, as there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach that can be applied uniformly across all communities. Communities with unique characteristics (e.g., geographic, demographic, and social vulnerabilities) require tailored resilience strategies aligned with their stakeholders’ values and priorities. Stakeholder values refer to the things that are of importance, merit, and provide utilities to stakeholders, and stakeholders from different communities may hold values with varying degrees of importance, forming their own distinct value systems. Despite the abundance of research on stakeholder engagement in resilience planning, there remains a limited understanding of what stakeholders value or prioritize in resilience planning. To address this gap, our study examined stakeholder value systems and analyzed how the value systems vary across different communities (e.g., coastal versus inland; metropolitan versus nonmetropolitan; more versus less socially vulnerable). We used a semisupervised learning algorithm—Anchored correlation explanation (anchored CorEx)—to analyze the social media data from Twitter collected within the Florida communities. We found that: (1) physical built environment resilience values were ranked the highest, followed by environmental, social, and economic resilience values; (2) structural robustness and integrity, resource efficiency, comfort and health, and financial support were the highest-ranked values in the physical built environment, environmental, social, and economic resilience categories, respectively; (3) stakeholders from different communities had significant variations in their prioritizations of certain values (e.g., resource efficiency, beneficial land use); and (4) values such as structural robustness and integrity and resource efficiency require more attention in community resilience planning. The findings of this study could facilitate stakeholder-centered and community-specific resilience planning by tailoring resilience practices to the unique value systems held by community stakeholders.

Natural Hazards ReviewVol. 26(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Florida International University (US), Virginia Tech (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Disaster Management and Resilience
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.