Lateral Assessment of Mucomimetic Hydrogels to Evaluate Correlation between Microscopic and Macroscopic Properties

A major limitation in the development of mucosal drug delivery systems is the design of in vitro models that accurately reflect in vivo conditions. Traditionally, models seek to mimic characteristics of physiological mucus, often focusing on property-specific trial metrics such as rheological behavior or diffusion of a nanoparticle of interest. Despite the success of these models, translation from in vitro results to in vivo trials is limited. As a result, several authors have called for work to develop standardized testing methodologies and characterize the influence of model properties on drug delivery performance. To this end, a series of trials is performed on 12 mucomimetic hydrogels reproduced from literature. Experiments show that there is no consistent correlation between barrier performance and rheological or microstructural properties of the tested mucomimetic hydrogels. In addition, the permeability of both mucopenetrating and mucoadhesive nanoparticles is assessed, revealing non-obvious variations in barrier properties such as the relative contributions of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in different models. These results demonstrate the limitations of predicting mucomimetic behavior with common characterization techniques and highlight the importance of testing barrier performance with multiple nanoparticle formulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Macromolecular Bioscience
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202400146
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lateral Assessment of Mucomimetic Hydrogels to Evaluate Correlation between Microscopic and Macroscopic Properties

Nancy T. Li, Jeffrey Watchorn, Aaron J. Clasky, Jennifer Tram Su et al.
1 citations
Macromolecular Bioscience
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
0.21
article

Lateral Assessment of Mucomimetic Hydrogels to Evaluate Correlation between Microscopic and Macroscopic Properties

Nancy T. Li, Jeffrey Watchorn, Aaron J. Clasky, Jennifer Tram Su, Frank Gu, Alison P. McGuigan, Kristina L. Faurschou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A major limitation in the development of mucosal drug delivery systems is the design of in vitro models that accurately reflect in vivo conditions. Traditionally, models seek to mimic characteristics of physiological mucus, often focusing on property-specific trial metrics such as rheological behavior or diffusion of a nanoparticle of interest. Despite the success of these models, translation from in vitro results to in vivo trials is limited. As a result, several authors have called for work to develop standardized testing methodologies and characterize the influence of model properties on drug delivery performance. To this end, a series of trials is performed on 12 mucomimetic hydrogels reproduced from literature. Experiments show that there is no consistent correlation between barrier performance and rheological or microstructural properties of the tested mucomimetic hydrogels. In addition, the permeability of both mucopenetrating and mucoadhesive nanoparticles is assessed, revealing non-obvious variations in barrier properties such as the relative contributions of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in different models. These results demonstrate the limitations of predicting mucomimetic behavior with common characterization techniques and highlight the importance of testing barrier performance with multiple nanoparticle formulations.

Macromolecular BioscienceVol. 24(12)
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA), University of Toronto (CA), McGill University (CA)
McLean Foundation, University of Toronto, Canada First Research Excellence Fund, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.