Prevalence and impact of remote and hybrid work in academic health sciences libraries
Remote/hybrid work is common in academic health science libraries and highly valued by employees. While not without challenges, remote/hybrid work appears to be a valuable tool to support recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction of workers in academic health sciences libraries. The findings of this study can inform library decision makers about future use of remote/hybrid work.
Authors
- Janet Crum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2722-3645)
- Matthew Covey
- David Petersen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0986-5946)
Institutions
- Center for Assessment (US)
- California State University, Fresno (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Rockefeller University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA
- Published
- 2024-10-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1905
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Web and Library Services
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.56
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences