Addressing Problems With Medicaid Home And Community-Based Services In The Age Of Rebalancing

For nearly a half-century, Congress has created various legal authorities from among which states may select to provide Medicaid beneficiaries with long-term services and supports (LTSS) in home and community-based settings, instead of in institutions. This article describes these legal authorities and their genesis and contends that a simpler architecture would better serve program goals. In theory, state-level variation could shine a light on how Medicaid can best meet beneficiaries’ needs. Instead, a maze of federal legal authorities has resulted in inconsistent and inequitable access to care among beneficiaries and across geographies. The many programs are difficult to understand, even for researchers and regulators trying to measure outcomes. This opacity obscures the most effective paths forward as the demand for Medicaid LTSS grows. Simplifying Medicaid LTSS legal authorities could ease burdens for states and better serve beneficiaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01276
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Problems With Medicaid Home And Community-Based Services In The Age Of Rebalancing

Norma B. Coe, Pilar Goñalons-Pons, Amanda R. Kreider, Katherine E. M. Miller et al.
7 citations
Health Affairs
Healthcare Policy and Management
7.90
article

Addressing Problems With Medicaid Home And Community-Based Services In The Age Of Rebalancing

Norma B. Coe, Pilar Goñalons-Pons, Amanda R. Kreider, Katherine E. M. Miller, Allison K. Hoffman, Katherine Rohde
article en
7 citations

Abstract

For nearly a half-century, Congress has created various legal authorities from among which states may select to provide Medicaid beneficiaries with long-term services and supports (LTSS) in home and community-based settings, instead of in institutions. This article describes these legal authorities and their genesis and contends that a simpler architecture would better serve program goals. In theory, state-level variation could shine a light on how Medicaid can best meet beneficiaries’ needs. Instead, a maze of federal legal authorities has resulted in inconsistent and inequitable access to care among beneficiaries and across geographies. The many programs are difficult to understand, even for researchers and regulators trying to measure outcomes. This opacity obscures the most effective paths forward as the demand for Medicaid LTSS grows. Simplifying Medicaid LTSS legal authorities could ease burdens for states and better serve beneficiaries.

Health AffairsVol. 43(10)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Mount Allison University (CA), University of Pittsburgh (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Normandie Université (FR), Prek Leap National College of Agriculture (KH), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Policy and Management
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.