Equipping computational pathology systems with artifact processing pipelines: a showcase for computation and performance trade-offs

The proposed artifact detection pipeline will not only ensure reliable CPATH predictions but may also provide quality control. In this work, the best-performing pipeline for artifact detection is MoE with DCNNs. Our detailed experiments show that there is always a trade-off between performance and computational complexity, and no straightforward DL solution equally suits all types of data and applications. The code and HistoArtifacts dataset can be found online at Github and Zenodo , respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02676-z
Citations
11
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equipping computational pathology systems with artifact processing pipelines: a showcase for computation and performance trade-offs

Umay Kiraz, Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon, Carlos Couceiro Monteagudo, Farbod Khoraminia et al.
11 citations
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
AI in cancer detection
3.82
article

Equipping computational pathology systems with artifact processing pipelines: a showcase for computation and performance trade-offs

Umay Kiraz, Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon, Carlos Couceiro Monteagudo, Farbod Khoraminia, Kjersti Engan, Neel Kanwal, Andrés Mosquera‐Zamudio, Chunming Rong, Emiel A. M. Janssen
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The proposed artifact detection pipeline will not only ensure reliable CPATH predictions but may also provide quality control. In this work, the best-performing pipeline for artifact detection is MoE with DCNNs. Our detailed experiments show that there is always a trade-off between performance and computational complexity, and no straightforward DL solution equally suits all types of data and applications. The code and HistoArtifacts dataset can be found online at Github and Zenodo , respectively.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingVol. 24(1)
Universitat de València (ES), Stavanger University Hospital (NO), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), INCLIVA Health Research Institute (ES), University of Stavanger (NO)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in cancer detection
3.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Equipping computational pathology systems with artifact processing pipelines: a showcase for computation and performance trade-offs — Umay Kiraz, Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon, et al. · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS