A Note on Related-Tweakey Impossible Differential Attacks

In this note we review the technique proposed at ToSC 2018 by Sadeghi et al. for attacks built upon several related-tweakey impossible differential trails. We show that the initial encryption queries are improper and lead the authors to misevaluate a filtering value in the key recovery phase. We identified 4 other papers (from Eurocrypt, DCC, and 2 from ToSC) that follow on the results of Sadeghi et al. and in three of them the flawed technique was reused. We thus present a careful analysis of these types of attacks and give generic complexity formulas similar to the ones proposed by Boura et al. at Asiacrypt 2014. We apply these to the aforementioned papers and provide patched versions of their attacks. The main consequence is an increase in the memory complexity. We show that in many cases (a notable exception being quantum impossible differentials) it is possible to recover the numeric time estimates of the flawed analysis, and in all cases we were able to build a correct attack reaching the same number of rounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62056/abbn-4c2h
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Note on Related-Tweakey Impossible Differential Attacks

Xavier Bonnetain, Virginie Lallemand
1 citations
IACR Communications in Cryptology
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
0.35
article

A Note on Related-Tweakey Impossible Differential Attacks

Xavier Bonnetain, Virginie Lallemand
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this note we review the technique proposed at ToSC 2018 by Sadeghi et al. for attacks built upon several related-tweakey impossible differential trails. We show that the initial encryption queries are improper and lead the authors to misevaluate a filtering value in the key recovery phase. We identified 4 other papers (from Eurocrypt, DCC, and 2 from ToSC) that follow on the results of Sadeghi et al. and in three of them the flawed technique was reused. We thus present a careful analysis of these types of attacks and give generic complexity formulas similar to the ones proposed by Boura et al. at Asiacrypt 2014. We apply these to the aforementioned papers and provide patched versions of their attacks. The main consequence is an increase in the memory complexity. We show that in many cases (a notable exception being quantum impossible differentials) it is possible to recover the numeric time estimates of the flawed analysis, and in all cases we were able to build a correct attack reaching the same number of rounds.

IACR Communications in Cryptology
Laboratoire Lorrain de Recherche en Informatique et ses Applications (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Harvard Graduate School of Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cryptographic Implementations and Security
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.