Tropospheric amplification of stratosphere–troposphere coupling

Abstract During northern winter the stratospheric polar vortex is highly variable — even breaking down completely during sudden stratospheric warmings. The strength of the stratospheric polar vortex is observed to be coupled to surface weather, primarily through swings in the phase of the Northern Annular Mode — which is nearly uuivalent to polar‐cap sea‐level pressure. Pressure changes (as a function of height) are largest at the surface, which is difficult to reconcile with the remote effects of stratospheric variability. This conundrum requires some mechanism(s) to amplify the polar sea‐level pressure anomalies. A simple, intuitive explanation has remained elusive. We use Japanese 55‐year Reanalysis (JRA‐55) reanalyses to investigate the reason that stratospheric variability causes large polar sea‐level pressure changes. The main result of this paper is that vertical movement of the polar tropopause is essential in understanding how surface pressure changes are generated. The strength of the polar vortex is strongly coupled to the height of the polar tropopause, resulting in stretching/compression of the polar tropospheric air column. This causes pressure changes that are largest at the surface. For example, the lowering of the polar tropopause during a sudden stratospheric warming leads to a compression and spin down of the tropospheric column and is therefore associated with higher polar sea‐level pressure. This mechanism can be compared to the textbook example of conservation of potential vorticity as an air column moves over a mountain range — except in this case the column depth changes because the stratosphere is changing the height of the tropopause. The observed vertical profile of pressure changes matches closely what would be expected from the stretching/compression mechanism. The higher polar sea‐level pressure associated with a sudden stratospheric warming is due mainly to mass moving into the polar cap within the troposphere, rather than rearranged mass in the stratosphere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4864
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tropospheric amplification of stratosphere–troposphere coupling

Mark Baldwin, Thomas Birner, Blanca Ayarzagüena
6 citations
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Climate variability and models
1.70
article

Tropospheric amplification of stratosphere–troposphere coupling

Mark Baldwin, Thomas Birner, Blanca Ayarzagüena
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract During northern winter the stratospheric polar vortex is highly variable — even breaking down completely during sudden stratospheric warmings. The strength of the stratospheric polar vortex is observed to be coupled to surface weather, primarily through swings in the phase of the Northern Annular Mode — which is nearly uuivalent to polar‐cap sea‐level pressure. Pressure changes (as a function of height) are largest at the surface, which is difficult to reconcile with the remote effects of stratospheric variability. This conundrum requires some mechanism(s) to amplify the polar sea‐level pressure anomalies. A simple, intuitive explanation has remained elusive. We use Japanese 55‐year Reanalysis (JRA‐55) reanalyses to investigate the reason that stratospheric variability causes large polar sea‐level pressure changes. The main result of this paper is that vertical movement of the polar tropopause is essential in understanding how surface pressure changes are generated. The strength of the polar vortex is strongly coupled to the height of the polar tropopause, resulting in stretching/compression of the polar tropospheric air column. This causes pressure changes that are largest at the surface. For example, the lowering of the polar tropopause during a sudden stratospheric warming leads to a compression and spin down of the tropospheric column and is therefore associated with higher polar sea‐level pressure. This mechanism can be compared to the textbook example of conservation of potential vorticity as an air column moves over a mountain range — except in this case the column depth changes because the stratosphere is changing the height of the tropopause. The observed vertical profile of pressure changes matches closely what would be expected from the stretching/compression mechanism. The higher polar sea‐level pressure associated with a sudden stratospheric warming is due mainly to mass moving into the polar cap within the troposphere, rather than rearranged mass in the stratosphere.

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyVol. 150(765)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), University of Exeter (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Climate variability and models
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.