Evaluation of Some Uncertainties in the Modeling of Blast Furnace Hydrogen Injection

While blast furnaces remain the dominant ironmaking technology, there is growing interest in using hydrogen to partially replace coke and pulverized coal to reduce CO 2 emissions in this hard‐to‐decarbonize process. However, significant discrepancies in modeling the tuyere injection of hydrogen are noted in the literature, which can challenge the scale‐up from modeling predictions and pilot trials to actual blast furnace operations. To address this, the impact of uncertainties in the assumptions of the temperature in the thermal reserve zone and the ratio of H 2 and CO utilization on the results of blast furnace process modeling are evaluated using a 1D steady‐state zonal model. The study indicates that variations in the assumed value of thermal reserve zone temperature significantly impact the estimation of optimal hydrogen injection rate, coke replacement ratio, and direct CO 2 emissions reductions. In contrast, the same parameters are much less affected by the variations in the assumed value of the proportion between H 2 and CO utilization ratios, which, however, affect the top gas composition. A need for further research to determine the range of the difference in temperatures of gas and solid in the thermal reserve zone tolerable for smooth blast furnace operation is highlighted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
steel research international
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.202400346
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Some Uncertainties in the Modeling of Blast Furnace Hydrogen Injection

Volodymyr Shatokha
2 citations
steel research international
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
0.43
article

Evaluation of Some Uncertainties in the Modeling of Blast Furnace Hydrogen Injection

Volodymyr Shatokha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

While blast furnaces remain the dominant ironmaking technology, there is growing interest in using hydrogen to partially replace coke and pulverized coal to reduce CO 2 emissions in this hard‐to‐decarbonize process. However, significant discrepancies in modeling the tuyere injection of hydrogen are noted in the literature, which can challenge the scale‐up from modeling predictions and pilot trials to actual blast furnace operations. To address this, the impact of uncertainties in the assumptions of the temperature in the thermal reserve zone and the ratio of H 2 and CO utilization on the results of blast furnace process modeling are evaluated using a 1D steady‐state zonal model. The study indicates that variations in the assumed value of thermal reserve zone temperature significantly impact the estimation of optimal hydrogen injection rate, coke replacement ratio, and direct CO 2 emissions reductions. In contrast, the same parameters are much less affected by the variations in the assumed value of the proportion between H 2 and CO utilization ratios, which, however, affect the top gas composition. A need for further research to determine the range of the difference in temperatures of gas and solid in the thermal reserve zone tolerable for smooth blast furnace operation is highlighted.

steel research internationalVol. 96(8)
HI Iberia (Spain) (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
0.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Some Uncertainties in the Modeling of Blast Furnace Hydrogen Injection — Volodymyr Shatokha · steel research international (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS