Index of application status transparency and availability of public information for Project Orbis agencies

The purpose of this paper is to provide a guideline for understanding and comparing the regulatory framework of Project Orbis Partners (POPs) and Project Orbis observers, with a focus on their approaches to drug approvals, rejections, and withdrawals. While each agency has its own regulatory framework and guidance, there are some similarities and differences between the language used to describe drug approvals, rejections, withdrawals, and the public availability of these decisions. Project Orbis is an international partnership of regulatory agency, led by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), aimed at streamlining the submission and review processes to expedite the global availability of oncology medications for patients. Since its inception, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Brazil’s National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), Canada’s Health Canada (HC), Israel’s Ministry of Health (IMoH) Medical Technologies, Health Information, Innovation and Research (MTIIR) Directorate, Singapore’s Health Sciences Authority (HSA), Switzerland’s Swissmedic (SMC), and United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have joined and become POPs. Other international agencies such as, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) are currently observing Project Orbis, as of late 2023. They are not full Project Orbis partners but work closely with the FDA to facilitate oncology drug approval through international collaboration. Running Title: An Index of the FDA and international regulators involved in Project Orbis looking at the similarities and differences between approval, rejection, and withdrawal characteristics of applications and public transparency of actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22270/ijdra.v12i3.699
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Index of application status transparency and availability of public information for Project Orbis agencies

Laura Johnson, Dianne Spillman, R. Angelo de Claro, Lauren Tesh Hotaki et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs
Geographic Information Systems Studies
1.96
article

Index of application status transparency and availability of public information for Project Orbis agencies

Laura Johnson, Dianne Spillman, R. Angelo de Claro, Lauren Tesh Hotaki, N. M. Y. Ahmed, Melissa Hunt, Anat Boehm‐Cagan, Osnat Luxenburg, Sso H. Lee, Marc Robert Theoret, Yee Hoo Looi, Ulrich‐Peter Rohr, Eiman Atiek, Yoko Aoi, Caroline Voltz-Girolt, Carlos Aicardo, Tal Naggan, Michal Hirsch-Vexberg, Krystal De Villiers, Kirubel Eshetie, Fanny Cudre-Mauroux, Masakazu Hirata, Jessica Samuel, Duc Vu, Kukhwa Oh, Lenardo N. Santos, S Andreoli, Callan Cain, Graham Searle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a guideline for understanding and comparing the regulatory framework of Project Orbis Partners (POPs) and Project Orbis observers, with a focus on their approaches to drug approvals, rejections, and withdrawals. While each agency has its own regulatory framework and guidance, there are some similarities and differences between the language used to describe drug approvals, rejections, withdrawals, and the public availability of these decisions. Project Orbis is an international partnership of regulatory agency, led by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), aimed at streamlining the submission and review processes to expedite the global availability of oncology medications for patients. Since its inception, Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Brazil’s National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), Canada’s Health Canada (HC), Israel’s Ministry of Health (IMoH) Medical Technologies, Health Information, Innovation and Research (MTIIR) Directorate, Singapore’s Health Sciences Authority (HSA), Switzerland’s Swissmedic (SMC), and United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have joined and become POPs. Other international agencies such as, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) are currently observing Project Orbis, as of late 2023. They are not full Project Orbis partners but work closely with the FDA to facilitate oncology drug approval through international collaboration. Running Title: An Index of the FDA and international regulators involved in Project Orbis looking at the similarities and differences between approval, rejection, and withdrawal characteristics of applications and public transparency of actions.

International Journal of Drug Regulatory AffairsVol. 12(3)
European Medicines Agency (NL), United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Swissmedic (CH), University of Rhode Island (US), Health Sciences Authority (SG), Government of Canada (CA), Israel Ministry of Health (IL), University of Florida (US), National Water Agency (BR), Rhode Island College (US), Chicago State University (US), Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (JP), Florida College (US)
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Health Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.