Translating and Re-narrating Short Story Moral: Mediating Public and Meta Narratives

Objectives: This study explores the role of translation in mediating the morals of short stories by examining the differences in how messages are communicated through meta and publicly elaborated narratives. Methods: The study employs a contrastive content analysis method to compare the impact of public and meta-narratives on the reception of short stories by Jordanian elementary school students. These short stories aim to either reinforce existing values or introduce new ones. Results: The study shows that public narratives are effective in reinforcing pre-existing values, while meta-narratives are effective in introducing new values when translation is used as a mediating tool. The study also emphasizes the significance of the narrative dimension of meaning, as no statistically significant differences were found between fourth and seventh genders. The differences were limited to meta and public narration. Conclusions: The study concludes that the translators must employ different strategies when reinforcing, challenging, or introducing a new interpretation based on their understanding of the target language's context and culture. For example, the importance of recycling might serve as a reminder in one society and as a novel concept in another.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dirasat Human and Social Sciences
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i6.5215
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating and Re-narrating Short Story Moral: Mediating Public and Meta Narratives

Haitham Aldreabi
Dirasat Human and Social Sciences
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Translating and Re-narrating Short Story Moral: Mediating Public and Meta Narratives

Haitham Aldreabi
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores the role of translation in mediating the morals of short stories by examining the differences in how messages are communicated through meta and publicly elaborated narratives. Methods: The study employs a contrastive content analysis method to compare the impact of public and meta-narratives on the reception of short stories by Jordanian elementary school students. These short stories aim to either reinforce existing values or introduce new ones. Results: The study shows that public narratives are effective in reinforcing pre-existing values, while meta-narratives are effective in introducing new values when translation is used as a mediating tool. The study also emphasizes the significance of the narrative dimension of meaning, as no statistically significant differences were found between fourth and seventh genders. The differences were limited to meta and public narration. Conclusions: The study concludes that the translators must employ different strategies when reinforcing, challenging, or introducing a new interpretation based on their understanding of the target language's context and culture. For example, the importance of recycling might serve as a reminder in one society and as a novel concept in another.

Dirasat Human and Social SciencesVol. 51(6)
Mutah University (JO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.