Poverty Imputation in Contexts Without Consumption Data: A Revisit With Further Refinements

Survey‐to‐survey imputation has been increasingly employed to address data gaps for poverty measurement in poorer countries. We refine existing imputation models, using 14 multi‐topic household surveys conducted over the past decade in Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Vietnam. We find that adding household utility expenditures to a basic imputation model with household‐level demographic and employment variables provides accurate estimates, which even fall within one standard error of the true poverty rates in many cases. The proposed imputation method performs better than several commonly used multiple imputation and machine learning techniques. Further adding geospatial variables improves accuracy, as does including additional community‐level predictors (available from data in Vietnam) related to educational achievement, poverty, and asset wealth. Yet, within‐country spatial heterogeneity exists, with certain models performing well for either urban areas or rural areas only. These results offer cost‐saving inputs into future survey design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12714
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poverty Imputation in Contexts Without Consumption Data: A Revisit With Further Refinements

Kseniya Abanokova, Hai‐Anh Dang, Talip Kilic, Calogero Carletto
2 citations
Review of Income and Wealth
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
2.26
article

Poverty Imputation in Contexts Without Consumption Data: A Revisit With Further Refinements

Kseniya Abanokova, Hai‐Anh Dang, Talip Kilic, Calogero Carletto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Survey‐to‐survey imputation has been increasingly employed to address data gaps for poverty measurement in poorer countries. We refine existing imputation models, using 14 multi‐topic household surveys conducted over the past decade in Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Vietnam. We find that adding household utility expenditures to a basic imputation model with household‐level demographic and employment variables provides accurate estimates, which even fall within one standard error of the true poverty rates in many cases. The proposed imputation method performs better than several commonly used multiple imputation and machine learning techniques. Further adding geospatial variables improves accuracy, as does including additional community‐level predictors (available from data in Vietnam) related to educational achievement, poverty, and asset wealth. Yet, within‐country spatial heterogeneity exists, with certain models performing well for either urban areas or rural areas only. These results offer cost‐saving inputs into future survey design.

Review of Income and WealthVol. 71(1)
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), World Bank Group (US), Indiana University (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
United States Agency for International Development, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.