'Monkeypox, where is your rage?': The racialization, sexualization, and securitization of global health

With the purposes of identifying the underlying challenges of global and public health governance of outbreaks, this paper explores three key themes that emerged in response to the 2022 mpox epidemic: the belated change of disease nomenclature from monkeypox to mpox; the classification of mpox as a sexually transmitted infection (STI); and the unpreparedness of health agencies to vaccinate impacted populations. The paper makes the case that, because of the global and public health tensions arising from racialized nomenclatures, sexualized classifications, biosecuritized borders, and monopolized vaccines, national and international agencies failed in providing an adequate and comprehensive response to the latest mpox pandemic, which contributed further to the pathologization of already vulnerable and stigmatized population groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Public Health
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jcph.v1i2.79353
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

'Monkeypox, where is your rage?': The racialization, sexualization, and securitization of global health

Tankut Atuk, Francesca Cannon
4 citations
Journal of Critical Public Health
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
1.17
article

'Monkeypox, where is your rage?': The racialization, sexualization, and securitization of global health

Tankut Atuk, Francesca Cannon
article en
4 citations

Abstract

With the purposes of identifying the underlying challenges of global and public health governance of outbreaks, this paper explores three key themes that emerged in response to the 2022 mpox epidemic: the belated change of disease nomenclature from monkeypox to mpox; the classification of mpox as a sexually transmitted infection (STI); and the unpreparedness of health agencies to vaccinate impacted populations. The paper makes the case that, because of the global and public health tensions arising from racialized nomenclatures, sexualized classifications, biosecuritized borders, and monopolized vaccines, national and international agencies failed in providing an adequate and comprehensive response to the latest mpox pandemic, which contributed further to the pathologization of already vulnerable and stigmatized population groups.

Journal of Critical Public HealthVol. 1(2)
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.