What role for law in refugee studies? Towards a transdisciplinary agenda

Abstract Refugee law has historically formed an important part of refugee studies. Yet, in the past decades, the legal study of refugees has increasingly developed out of sync with refugee studies more generally. The purpose of this special issue is to help bridge the gap between refugee law and refugee studies and foster a broader transdisciplinary research agenda on law within refugee studies scholarship. The special issue serves two overarching purposes. The first is to exemplify and celebrate methodological heterodoxy in refugee law scholarship—deliberately foregrounding perspectives often marginalized within more mainstream legal scholarship. To this end, this issue presents a range of contributions that draw on methods and theories from different disciplines in the study of refugee law, including anthropology, history, psychology, political science, organization studies, and data science. Second, by anchoring this special issue in the Journal of Refugee Studies, we hope to convince the wider refugee studies community that empirical and interdisciplinary legal methods may provide new and important insights into some of the core debates on and long-standing challenges to refugee law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refugee Studies
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feae068
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What role for law in refugee studies? Towards a transdisciplinary agenda

Daniel Ghezelbash, Thomas Gammeltoft‐Hansen
4 citations
Journal of Refugee Studies
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
41.42
article

What role for law in refugee studies? Towards a transdisciplinary agenda

Daniel Ghezelbash, Thomas Gammeltoft‐Hansen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Refugee law has historically formed an important part of refugee studies. Yet, in the past decades, the legal study of refugees has increasingly developed out of sync with refugee studies more generally. The purpose of this special issue is to help bridge the gap between refugee law and refugee studies and foster a broader transdisciplinary research agenda on law within refugee studies scholarship. The special issue serves two overarching purposes. The first is to exemplify and celebrate methodological heterodoxy in refugee law scholarship—deliberately foregrounding perspectives often marginalized within more mainstream legal scholarship. To this end, this issue presents a range of contributions that draw on methods and theories from different disciplines in the study of refugee law, including anthropology, history, psychology, political science, organization studies, and data science. Second, by anchoring this special issue in the Journal of Refugee Studies, we hope to convince the wider refugee studies community that empirical and interdisciplinary legal methods may provide new and important insights into some of the core debates on and long-standing challenges to refugee law.

Journal of Refugee StudiesVol. 37(4)
University of Copenhagen (DK), NSW Department of Communities and Justice (AU)
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond, NordForsk
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
41.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.