Államháztartási kiadások alakulása populista kormányok alatt Kelet-Közép-Európában

Since the 2010s, a populist turn has been taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, and consequently populist parties have assumed control over the respective governments. In the literature, populist rule has been characterised with a) an irresponsible fiscal policy which ignores the budget constraint; and b) a biased redistribution policy that deliberately divides society into two antagonistic groups. Our analysis, covering the period between 2010 and 2022, demonstrates that populist governments in the region – generally speaking – have not relied on the accumulation of public deficit and debt; they, have, in fact, not differed from their non-populist peers with regard to fiscal discipline. Nevertheless, incumbent populist parties have used a conscious redistribution policy in their spending activities by favouring certain groups in society. Yet the spending preferences of populist parties in the region do show discrepancies as well; therefore, no single type of fiscal programme can be identified in the studied period.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Közgazdasági Szemle
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18414/ksz.2024.10.1001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Államháztartási kiadások alakulása populista kormányok alatt Kelet-Közép-Európában

István Benczes, Norbert Szijártó
1 citations
Közgazdasági Szemle
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
1.96
article

Államháztartási kiadások alakulása populista kormányok alatt Kelet-Közép-Európában

István Benczes, Norbert Szijártó
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the 2010s, a populist turn has been taking place in Central and Eastern Europe, and consequently populist parties have assumed control over the respective governments. In the literature, populist rule has been characterised with a) an irresponsible fiscal policy which ignores the budget constraint; and b) a biased redistribution policy that deliberately divides society into two antagonistic groups. Our analysis, covering the period between 2010 and 2022, demonstrates that populist governments in the region – generally speaking – have not relied on the accumulation of public deficit and debt; they, have, in fact, not differed from their non-populist peers with regard to fiscal discipline. Nevertheless, incumbent populist parties have used a conscious redistribution policy in their spending activities by favouring certain groups in society. Yet the spending preferences of populist parties in the region do show discrepancies as well; therefore, no single type of fiscal programme can be identified in the studied period.

Közgazdasági SzemleVol. 71(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.