Level of satisfaction with the results of science and technology processes in the context of medical education

Introduction: The Science, Technology and Innovation System constitutes the organizational form to implement the scientific and technological policy in the health sector in accordance with the economic and social development strategy of Cuba.Objective: to evaluate the level of satisfaction regarding the results of the science and technology processes, as part of one of the prioritized lines of research of the Vice-Rectorate of Teaching and Research of the University of Medical Sciences of Havana, Cuba.Methods: descriptive, cross-sectional, and instrumental observational study with a quantitative approach. The study involved 31 research managers who were given a questionnaire consisting of three closed questions and two open questions following the guidelines of the Iadov technique; the analysis of the answers allowed obtaining indirect information on the level of individual and group satisfaction of the participants. Results: The overall group satisfaction index is 0.645 (acceptable), although it is higher in the Science and Technology Entities (IG=0.710) than in the Medical Sciences Faculties (0.625).Conclusions: The results of the research indicate an acceptable but insufficient level of individual and group satisfaction, although higher in the Science, Technology and Innovation Entities than in the faculties. The projects, categorization and scientific publications of the university's medical potential are the main concerns of the managers

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seminars in Medical Writing and Education
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202538
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Level of satisfaction with the results of science and technology processes in the context of medical education

Roberto Lardoeyt Ferrer, Juan Rubén Herrera Masó
3 citations
Seminars in Medical Writing and Education
Medical and Biological Sciences
9.83
article

Level of satisfaction with the results of science and technology processes in the context of medical education

Roberto Lardoeyt Ferrer, Juan Rubén Herrera Masó
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The Science, Technology and Innovation System constitutes the organizational form to implement the scientific and technological policy in the health sector in accordance with the economic and social development strategy of Cuba.Objective: to evaluate the level of satisfaction regarding the results of the science and technology processes, as part of one of the prioritized lines of research of the Vice-Rectorate of Teaching and Research of the University of Medical Sciences of Havana, Cuba.Methods: descriptive, cross-sectional, and instrumental observational study with a quantitative approach. The study involved 31 research managers who were given a questionnaire consisting of three closed questions and two open questions following the guidelines of the Iadov technique; the analysis of the answers allowed obtaining indirect information on the level of individual and group satisfaction of the participants. Results: The overall group satisfaction index is 0.645 (acceptable), although it is higher in the Science and Technology Entities (IG=0.710) than in the Medical Sciences Faculties (0.625).Conclusions: The results of the research indicate an acceptable but insufficient level of individual and group satisfaction, although higher in the Science, Technology and Innovation Entities than in the faculties. The projects, categorization and scientific publications of the university's medical potential are the main concerns of the managers

Seminars in Medical Writing and EducationVol. 4
Instituto Superior Politécnico Metropolitano de Angola (AO), Instituto Superior Politécnico de Tecnologia e Ciências (AO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Medical and Biological Sciences
9.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.