Justice, Equity, and Approaches for Sharing Benefits from Deep Sea Mining Operations in the Area

Abstract This article critically examines the current benefit-sharing regime on the international seabed (the Area) and the proposed modalities for benefit-sharing. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea contains few and vague rules on this issue. The only obligation is that benefit-sharing should be ‘equitable’ and the interests of developing States must be considered. To determine what may constitute equitable sharing the practice of other law of the sea legal regimes are examined and proposed distribution mechanisms are critically analysed. The article offers a unique perspective by trying to identify the scope of the vague equitable criterion for sharing or distributing benefits, rather than referring to it as a general goal or principle. Doing so, the article offers a practical account for the feasibility of different distribution modalities, which may yield new insights for institutional design to better deal with challenges in this well-researched but still unclear issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10205
Citations
5
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Justice, Equity, and Approaches for Sharing Benefits from Deep Sea Mining Operations in the Area

Shani Friedman
5 citations
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
International Maritime Law Issues
3.55
article

Justice, Equity, and Approaches for Sharing Benefits from Deep Sea Mining Operations in the Area

Shani Friedman
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article critically examines the current benefit-sharing regime on the international seabed (the Area) and the proposed modalities for benefit-sharing. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea contains few and vague rules on this issue. The only obligation is that benefit-sharing should be ‘equitable’ and the interests of developing States must be considered. To determine what may constitute equitable sharing the practice of other law of the sea legal regimes are examined and proposed distribution mechanisms are critically analysed. The article offers a unique perspective by trying to identify the scope of the vague equitable criterion for sharing or distributing benefits, rather than referring to it as a general goal or principle. Doing so, the article offers a practical account for the feasibility of different distribution modalities, which may yield new insights for institutional design to better deal with challenges in this well-researched but still unclear issue.

The International Journal of Marine and Coastal LawVol. 40(3)
Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
International Maritime Law Issues
3.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.