Search advantages for facing social groups reflect optimal interactive group sizes

Humans are sensitive to the presence of other people as well as their interactions. For example, two individuals are found faster when they face toward (vs. away from) each other. We asked if this perceptual preference for facing social groups might be modulated by group size, being most pronounced for small groups, which are most common in everyday life. In three preregistered experiments, participants searched for facing or non-facing groups, with group size varying from two to eight. Facing groups were found faster than non-facing groups but only for groups up to five people (Experiment 1). This effect replicated when controlling for the number of individuals in the displays (Experiment 2) and was reduced for displays in inverted orientations (Experiment 3). Thus, human perception seems to be well-tuned to detect interactions in small groups, which parallels social preferences in everyday life and bridges across visual perception and social cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111105
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Search advantages for facing social groups reflect optimal interactive group sizes

Clara Colombatto, Jelena Ristic, Luowei Yan
5 citations
iScience
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
5.66
article

Search advantages for facing social groups reflect optimal interactive group sizes

Clara Colombatto, Jelena Ristic, Luowei Yan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Humans are sensitive to the presence of other people as well as their interactions. For example, two individuals are found faster when they face toward (vs. away from) each other. We asked if this perceptual preference for facing social groups might be modulated by group size, being most pronounced for small groups, which are most common in everyday life. In three preregistered experiments, participants searched for facing or non-facing groups, with group size varying from two to eight. Facing groups were found faster than non-facing groups but only for groups up to five people (Experiment 1). This effect replicated when controlling for the number of individuals in the displays (Experiment 2) and was reduced for displays in inverted orientations (Experiment 3). Thus, human perception seems to be well-tuned to detect interactions in small groups, which parallels social preferences in everyday life and bridges across visual perception and social cognition.

iScienceVol. 27(11)
University of Waterloo (CA), McGill University (CA)
McGill University, Canada First Research Excellence Fund, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Search advantages for facing social groups reflect optimal interactive group sizes — Clara Colombatto, Jelena Ristic, et al. · iScience (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS